Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:9
|
作者
Nicolet, Anna [1 ]
Perraudin, Clemence [1 ]
Wagner, Joel [2 ,3 ]
Gilles, Ingrid [1 ]
Krucien, Nicolas [4 ]
Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle [1 ]
Marti, Joachim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth Unisante, Biopole 2 SV A, Route Corniche 10, CH-1010 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Fac Business & Econ HEC, Dept Actuarial Sci, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Finance Inst, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Evidera, Patient Ctr Res, London, England
来源
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
HEALTH-INSURANCE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED CARE; CENTERED CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; DECISION; MODELS; STATE; INTERVENTIONS; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Our objective was to develop and test a discrete choice experiment (DCE) eliciting public and patient preferences for better-coordinated care in Switzerland. Methods We applied a multistage mixed-methods procedure using qualitative and quantitative approaches. First, to identify attributes, we performed a review of the DCE literature in healthcare with a focus on chronic care. Next, attribute selection involved stakeholders (N = 7) from various healthcare sectors to select the most relevant and actionable attributes, followed by three organized focus groups involving the general public and patients (N = 21) to verify the selection and the clarity of the DCE tasks and explanations. Finally, we conducted an online pilot in the target population to test the survey and obtain priors for a final six tested attributes to refine the final design of the experiment. Results After identifying an initial 33 attributes, a final list of six attributes was selected following stakeholder involvement and the three focus groups involving the target population. At the online pilot-testing stage with 301 participants, the majority of respondents found the DCE choice tasks socially relevant for Switzerland but challenging. The quality of the answers was relatively high. Most attributes had signs matching those in the literature and focus group discussions. Conclusion This article will be useful to researchers designing DCEs from a broad health policy perspective. The multistage approach involving a range of stakeholders was essential for the development of a DCE that is relevant for policy makers and well-accepted by the general public and patients.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 496
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Anna Nicolet
    Clémence Perraudin
    Joël Wagner
    Ingrid Gilles
    Nicolas Krucien
    Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
    Joachim Marti
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2022, 15 : 485 - 496
  • [2] Preferences for coordinated care for rare diseases: discrete choice experiment
    Morris, Stephen
    Walton, Holly
    Simpson, Amy
    Leeson-Beevers, Kerry
    Bloom, Lara
    Hunter, Amy
    Ramsay, Angus I. G.
    Fulop, Naomi J.
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Kai, Joe
    Sutcliffe, Alastair G.
    Kokocinska, Maria
    Kerecuk, Larissa
    Taylor, Christine A.
    Ng, Pei Li
    [J]. ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [3] Oncology patient preferences for depression care: A discrete choice experiment
    Hobden, Breanne
    Turon, Heidi
    Bryant, Jamie
    Wall, Laura
    Brown, Scott
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (04) : 807 - 814
  • [4] Patient preferences for models of care for fibromyalgia: A discrete choice experiment
    Norwood, Patricia
    Beasley, Marcus
    Stevens, Martin
    Hollick, Rosemary
    Macfarlane, Gary
    McNamee, Paul
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (06):
  • [5] Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany - a discrete choice experiment
    Krinke, Kim-Sarah
    Tangermann, Ulla
    Amelung, Volker Eric
    Krauth, Christian
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [6] Public preferences for primary care provision in Germany – a discrete choice experiment
    Kim-Sarah Krinke
    Ulla Tangermann
    Volker Eric Amelung
    Christian Krauth
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [7] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M.
    Atherly, Adam J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2020, 26 (07): : E219 - +
  • [8] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
    Atherly, Adam
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01): : 142 - 142
  • [9] Patient Preferences for the Arrangement of Integrated Care Programmes: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Streibelt, M.
    Bethge, M.
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2009, 14 (06): : 288 - 295
  • [10] Public Preferences for Allocating Ventilators in an Intensive Care Unit: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Norman, Richard
    Robinson, Suzanne
    Dickinson, Helen
    Williams, Iestyn
    Meshcheriakova, Elena
    Manipis, Kathleen
    Anstey, Matthew
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (03): : 319 - 330