A method to encourage and assess innovations in public tenders for infrastructure and construction projects

被引:11
|
作者
Lenderink, Bart [1 ]
Halman, Johannes I. M. [2 ]
Boes, Hans [3 ]
Voordijk, Hans [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Fac Construerende Tech Wetenschappen, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND | 2020年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Procurement; Innovation; Public policy; Infrastructure; Projects; Civil engineering; Civil engineering projects; PROCUREMENT; MANAGEMENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1108/CI-05-2019-0044
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Purpose Stimulating innovation in projects can contribute to achieving policy goals, addressing societal challenges and meeting objectives within programs and projects. Despite their potential, innovations are rarely included in tender assignments and evaluated in the award of civil engineering projects. One explanation for this is the perceived difficulty in triggering and objectively assessing innovations in the awarding of projects. The aim of this paper is to develop, implement and evaluated a method to encourage and assess innovations in the awarding of bridge construction projects to address this problem. Design/methodology/approach A design science research (DSR) approach is used to develop, implement and evaluate a method to trigger and assess innovations in tenders for bridge projects. DSR approaches are used to develop "well-tested, well-understood and well documented innovative generic designs, dealing with authentic field problems or opportunities" (van Aken et al., 2016). Findings The findings show that the application of the developed method in a bridge project led to the inclusion of a broad range of innovations in the tender offers. Despite the broad support for the defined criteria, there were some differences in the way the criteria were interpreted by the public procurement team and by the tenderers. Despite these differences, no legal claims were filed in court. Originality/value This paper contributes to the discussion on how the terms innovation and innovativeness can be operationalized and used in the literature and practice. The developed method provides definitions for assessing the degree as well as the level of innovations in tenders for bridge projects. Further, it provides a way to rank innovations and determine the additional value of the offered innovations in terms of a notional reduction in tender price. Finally, it provides insights into how to encourage innovations through public procurement in civil engineering projects.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 189
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reducing construction waste: A study of urban infrastructure projects
    de Magalhaes, Ruane Fernandes
    Ferreira Danilevicz, Angela de Moura
    Saurin, Tarcisio Abreu
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 67 : 265 - 277
  • [42] Factor analysis of construction practices for infrastructure projects in Korea
    Hee-Sung Park
    Soonwook Kwon
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2011, 15 : 439 - 445
  • [43] Target costing in public construction projects
    Sobotka, Anna
    Czarnigowska, Agata
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 375 - +
  • [44] Dispute Avoidance in Public Construction Projects
    Tabish, Syed Zafar Shahid
    Jha, Kumar Neeraj
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [45] On-site construction productivity in Malaysian infrastructure projects
    Durdyev, Serdar
    Ismail, Syuhaida
    STRUCTURAL SURVEY, 2016, 34 (4-5) : 446 - 462
  • [46] Making sense of collaboration in major infrastructure construction projects
    Ronndahl, Christoffer
    Bosch-Sijtsema, Petra
    Rempling, Rasmus
    Karlsson, Mats
    PROJECT LEADERSHIP AND SOCIETY, 2025, 6
  • [47] Key problems and countermeasures in BT projects in infrastructure construction
    Wu, X.-G., 1600, Editorial Department of Journal of Railway Engineering Society, China (30):
  • [48] Factor Analysis of Construction Practices for Infrastructure Projects in Korea
    Park, Hee-Sung
    Kwon, Soonwook
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 15 (03) : 439 - 445
  • [49] Successful Public Outreach Programs for Green Infrastructure Projects
    Ehsaei, Amir
    Sweet, Thomas
    Garcia, Raphael
    Adleman, Laura
    Walsh, Jean M.
    LID: IT WORKS IN ALL CLIMATES AND SOILS, 2015, : 74 - 92
  • [50] Evaluating the risks of public private partnerships for infrastructure projects
    Grimsey, Darrin
    Lewis, Mervyn K.
    International Journal of Project Management, 2002, 20 (02) : 107 - 118