A method to encourage and assess innovations in public tenders for infrastructure and construction projects

被引:11
|
作者
Lenderink, Bart [1 ]
Halman, Johannes I. M. [2 ]
Boes, Hans [3 ]
Voordijk, Hans [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Univ Twente, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Fac Construerende Tech Wetenschappen, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Construct Management & Engn, Enschede, Netherlands
来源
CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND | 2020年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Procurement; Innovation; Public policy; Infrastructure; Projects; Civil engineering; Civil engineering projects; PROCUREMENT; MANAGEMENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1108/CI-05-2019-0044
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Purpose Stimulating innovation in projects can contribute to achieving policy goals, addressing societal challenges and meeting objectives within programs and projects. Despite their potential, innovations are rarely included in tender assignments and evaluated in the award of civil engineering projects. One explanation for this is the perceived difficulty in triggering and objectively assessing innovations in the awarding of projects. The aim of this paper is to develop, implement and evaluated a method to encourage and assess innovations in the awarding of bridge construction projects to address this problem. Design/methodology/approach A design science research (DSR) approach is used to develop, implement and evaluate a method to trigger and assess innovations in tenders for bridge projects. DSR approaches are used to develop "well-tested, well-understood and well documented innovative generic designs, dealing with authentic field problems or opportunities" (van Aken et al., 2016). Findings The findings show that the application of the developed method in a bridge project led to the inclusion of a broad range of innovations in the tender offers. Despite the broad support for the defined criteria, there were some differences in the way the criteria were interpreted by the public procurement team and by the tenderers. Despite these differences, no legal claims were filed in court. Originality/value This paper contributes to the discussion on how the terms innovation and innovativeness can be operationalized and used in the literature and practice. The developed method provides definitions for assessing the degree as well as the level of innovations in tenders for bridge projects. Further, it provides a way to rank innovations and determine the additional value of the offered innovations in terms of a notional reduction in tender price. Finally, it provides insights into how to encourage innovations through public procurement in civil engineering projects.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 189
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Public participation in development of small infrastructure projects
    Rojanamon, Pannathat
    Chaisomphob, Taweep
    Bureekul, Thawilwadee
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 20 (05) : 320 - 334
  • [32] Impact of Characteristics of Infrastructure Projects on Public Opinion
    Valentin, Vanessa
    Naderpajouh, Nader
    Abraham, Dulcy
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 34 (01)
  • [33] Safety management strategies for public infrastructure projects
    Liao, C. W.
    Chiang, T. L.
    CIVIL, ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 507 - 510
  • [34] Stakeholder Management in Public Sector Infrastructure Projects
    Waris M.
    Khan A.
    Abideen A.Z.
    Sorooshian S.
    Ullah M.
    Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 2022, 12 (03) : 188 - 201
  • [35] Evaluation of Public Private Partnership in Infrastructure Projects
    Loganathan, Karthikeyan
    Najafi, Mohammad
    Kaushal, Vinayak
    Agyemang, Pius
    PIPELINES 2021: PLANNING, 2021, : 151 - 159
  • [36] Resilience Evaluation Method for Emergency Management of Infrastructure Construction Projects during Extreme Disasters
    Kou, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Kai
    Liu, Yuming
    Yang, Xiaoxu
    NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2025, 26 (02)
  • [37] Editorial: Managing competing public values in public infrastructure projects
    Koppenjan, Joop
    Charles, Michael B.
    Ryan, Neal
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 28 (03) : 131 - 134
  • [38] A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects
    Suprayoga, Gede B.
    Bakker, Martha
    Witte, Patrick
    Spit, Tejo
    EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [39] A systematic review of indicators to assess the sustainability of road infrastructure projects
    Gede B. Suprayoga
    Martha Bakker
    Patrick Witte
    Tejo Spit
    European Transport Research Review, 2020, 12
  • [40] Risk assessment for construction projects of transport infrastructure objects
    Titarenko, Boris
    ENERGY MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND TRANSPORT (EMMFT 2017), 2017, 90