Evaluation of residual monomer elimination methods in three different fissure sealants in vitro

被引:42
|
作者
Komurcuoglu, E
Olmez, S [1 ]
Vural, N
机构
[1] Univ Hacettepe, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Sci & Technol & Applicat Res Ctr, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
fissure sealant; Bis-glycidyl dimethacrylate; triethleneglycol dimethacrylate; oxygen inhibited layer; high performance liquid chromatography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01405.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the concentration of residual monomers and to evaluate the effectiveness of elimination methods of residual monomers in three different fissure sealant materials (Helioseal F, Filtek Flow and EXM-510). The sealant materials were divided into four subgroups because of the treatment methods used; one control group and three experimental groups (cotton roll, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste in cup). High performance liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentrations of residual monomers. Results of the study showed that residual Bis-glycidyl dimethacrylate elution was the highest in Helioseal F and the lowest in Filtek Flow with the three methods tested. For triethleneglycol dimethacrylate, EXM-510 eluted the highest residual monomer. It was also found that although the three tested methods were insufficient for removing all of the residual monomers and rubbing with cotton rolls was more effective than other two methods.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing
    Courson, F
    Renda, AM
    Attal, JP
    Bouter, D
    Ruse, D
    Degrange, M
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2003, 5 (04): : 313 - 321
  • [32] Residual monomer of autopolymerized acrylic resin according to different manipulation and polishing methods
    Goncalves, Tatiana Siqueira
    de Menezes, Luciane Macedo
    Aguiar Silva, Luiz Ernani
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2008, 78 (04) : 722 - 727
  • [33] Effects of Ozonated Water on Micro Leakage between Enamel and Fissure Sealants Prepared by Different Etching Technique (An in vitro Study)
    Jabar, Baraa M.
    Khalaf, Muna S.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10 (08): : 176 - 180
  • [34] Effect of acid etching and different Er:YAG laser procedures on microleakage of three different fissure sealants in primary teeth after aging
    Unal, Murat
    Hubbezoglu, Ihsan
    Zan, Recai
    Kapdan, Arife
    Hurmuzlu, Feridun
    DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2013, 32 (04) : 557 - 563
  • [35] Degree of conversion of three fissure sealants cured by different light curing units using micro-Raman spectroscopy
    Santini, Ario
    Miletic, Vesna
    Koutsaki, Deri
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2012, 7 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [36] Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants - an in vitro scanning electron microscope study
    Prabhakar, A. R.
    Murthy, Sankriti A.
    Sugandhan, S.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2011, 2 (04) : 324 - 330
  • [37] Comparative Evaluation of the Viscosity and Length of Resin Tags of Conventional and Hydrophilic Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent Molars: An In vitro Study
    Prabakar, Jayashri
    John, Joseph
    Arumugham, Meignana, I
    Kumar, Pradeep R.
    Sakthi, D. Sri
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2018, 9 (03) : 388 - 394
  • [38] Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins
    Didem Odabasi
    Cigdem Guler
    Didem Kucukaslan
    BMC Oral Health, 24
  • [39] Evaluation of the amount of residual monomer released from different flowable composite resins
    Odabasi, Didem
    Guler, Cigdem
    Kucukaslan, Didem
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [40] Evaluation of marginal adaptation, seal and resistance against fatigue cracks of different pit and fissure sealants under laboratory load
    Tapia, Maria Teresa Rodriguez
    Ardu, Stefano
    Daeniker, Laurent
    Krejci, Ivo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 24 (06): : 367 - 371