Evaluation of residual monomer elimination methods in three different fissure sealants in vitro

被引:42
|
作者
Komurcuoglu, E
Olmez, S [1 ]
Vural, N
机构
[1] Univ Hacettepe, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Sci & Technol & Applicat Res Ctr, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
fissure sealant; Bis-glycidyl dimethacrylate; triethleneglycol dimethacrylate; oxygen inhibited layer; high performance liquid chromatography;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01405.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the concentration of residual monomers and to evaluate the effectiveness of elimination methods of residual monomers in three different fissure sealant materials (Helioseal F, Filtek Flow and EXM-510). The sealant materials were divided into four subgroups because of the treatment methods used; one control group and three experimental groups (cotton roll, rubber cup and prophylaxis paste in cup). High performance liquid chromatography was used to determine the concentrations of residual monomers. Results of the study showed that residual Bis-glycidyl dimethacrylate elution was the highest in Helioseal F and the lowest in Filtek Flow with the three methods tested. For triethleneglycol dimethacrylate, EXM-510 eluted the highest residual monomer. It was also found that although the three tested methods were insufficient for removing all of the residual monomers and rubbing with cotton rolls was more effective than other two methods.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] In Vitro Microleakage Evaluation Around Three Types of Dental Sealants
    Muntean, Alexandrina
    Mesaros, Anca
    Festila, Dana
    Moldovan, Marioara
    Mesaros, Michaela
    MATERIALE PLASTICE, 2016, 53 (01) : 166 - 169
  • [23] In vitro surface analysis of the brushing resistance of orthodontic sealants using two different profilometric evaluation methods
    J. Lorenz
    I. Schidtmann
    M. Morawietz
    A. Kiesow
    H. Wehrbein
    S. Sarembe
    C. Erbe
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [24] In vitro surface analysis of the brushing resistance of orthodontic sealants using two different profilometric evaluation methods
    Lorenz, J.
    Schidtmann, I
    Morawietz, M.
    Kiesow, A.
    Wehrbein, H.
    Sarembe, S.
    Erbe, C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [25] EVALUATION OF RESIDUAL MONOMER CONTENT UTILIZING DIFFERENT POLYMERIZATION MODES
    BARTOLONI, JA
    SARKAR, NK
    WOFFORD, DT
    MURCHISON, DF
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 239 - 239
  • [26] In vitro evaluation of microleakage and penetration of four glass ionomer cements used as pit and fissure sealants.
    Bijella, MFB
    Menezes, JVNB
    Rios, D
    Bijella, MFTB
    Silva, SMB
    Pavarini, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 241 - 241
  • [27] In vitro evaluation of wear, superficial roughness and sorption of glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
    Rios, D
    Honório, HM
    Araújo, PA
    Machado, MAAM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A169 - A169
  • [28] Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial
    Kucukyilmaz, Ebru
    Savas, Selcuk
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 37 (05) : 468 - 473
  • [29] Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial
    Khare, Manasi
    Suprabha, Baranya Shrikrishna
    Shenoy, Ramya
    Rao, Arathi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 27 (06) : 444 - 453
  • [30] Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Four Different Pit and Fissure Sealants on the First Permanent Molars - An Original Research
    Rajkumari, Laleena
    Verma, Rajnish K.
    Rajmohan, M.
    Thakkar, Radhika
    Menon, Ipseeta
    Kumar, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S250 - S253