Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia

被引:12
|
作者
Nakajima, Hideo [1 ]
Sakamoto, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Tamada, Ikkei [2 ]
Ogata, Hisao [1 ]
Kishi, Kazuo [1 ]
Sakamoto, Teruo [3 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Shinjuku Ward, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Tokyo Metropolitan Childrens Med Ctr, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Fuchu, Tokyo 1838561, Japan
[3] Tokyo Dent Coll, Dept Orthodont, Mihama Ward, Chiba 2618502, Japan
关键词
Hemifacial microsomia; Distraction osteogenesis; Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction; Internal distraction device; MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION; OSTEOGENESIS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment-especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored. (C) 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 553
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Combined simultaneous distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla and mandible using a single distraction device in hemifacial microsomia
    Vu, HL
    Panchal, J
    Levine, I
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 12 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [32] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia: Long-term follow-up
    Meazzini, MC
    Mazzoleni, F
    Canzi, G
    Bozzetti, A
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 33 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [33] Simultaneous distraction osteogenesis of the mandible and maxilla just with internal devices in hemifacial microsomia
    Igawa, HH
    Kawashima, K
    Sugihara, T
    Sato, Y
    Iida, J
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 313 - 317
  • [34] Bidirectional mandibular distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of goldenhar variant of hemifacial microsomia: A case report
    Walker, DA
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 575 - 581
  • [35] Postoperative Changes in the Upper Airway Following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Pediatric Hemifacial Microsomia
    Barrero, Carlos
    Vu, Giap
    Kosyk, Mychajlo
    Humphries, Laura
    Jeon, Hyeran Helen
    Boucher, Normand
    Taylor, Jesse
    Nah, Hyun-Duck
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 33 (02) : 534 - 538
  • [36] Effects of unilateral vertical mandibular distraction osteogenesis on airway anatomy in children with hemifacial microsomia
    Pourtaheri, Navid
    Wang, Derek Z.
    Susarla, Srinivas M.
    Mundinger, Gerhard S.
    Kumar, Anand R.
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (12) : 2041 - 2045
  • [37] Mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral device and bite plate for a case of hemifacial microsomia
    Takashima, M
    Kitai, N
    Mori, Y
    Murakami, S
    Kreiborg, S
    Takada, K
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2003, 40 (04): : 437 - 445
  • [38] A new treatment strategy for hemifacial microsomia: Auricular reconstruction with an expanded two-flap method and simultaneous mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Wang, Bingqing
    Liu, Wei
    Li, Zhibin
    Qian, Jin
    Wang, Yue
    Liu, Tun
    Zhang, Qingguo
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (06): : 1950 - 1957
  • [39] Outcome of surgical-orthodontic treatment in hemifacial microsomia with and without early mandibular distraction osteogenesis
    Suppapinyaroj, C.
    Lin, C-H
    Lo, L-J
    Ko, E. W-C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (06) : 763 - 773
  • [40] Simultaneous maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis with a semiburied device
    Padwa, BL
    Kearns, GJ
    Todd, R
    Troulis, M
    Mulliken, JB
    Kaban, LB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 28 (01) : 2 - 8