Endovenous laser ablation: Does standard above-knee great saphenous vein ablation provide optimum results in patients with both above- and below-knee reflux? A randomized controlled trial

被引:76
|
作者
Theivacumar, Nadarajah S. [1 ]
Dellagrammaticas, Demos [1 ]
Mavor, Andrew I. D. [1 ]
Gough, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Infirm, Leeds Vasc Inst, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.062
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Following above-knee (AK) great saphenous vein (GSV) endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) 40% to 50% patients have residual varicosities. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) assesses whether more extensive GSV ablation enhances their resolution and influences symptom improvement. Method. Sixty-eight limbs (65 patients) with varicosities and above and below-knee GSV reflux were randomized to Group A: AK-EVLA (n = 23); Group B: EVLA mid-calf to groin (n = 23); and Group C: AK-EVLA, concomitant below-knee GSV foam sclerotherapy (n = 22). Primary outcomes were residual varicosities requiring sclerotherapy (6 weeks), improvement in Aberdeen varicose vein severity scores (AVVSS, 12 weeks), patient satisfaction, and complication rates. Results. EVLA ablated the treated GSV in all limbs. Sclerotherapy requirements were Group A: 14/23 (61%); Group B: 4/23 (17%); and Group C: 8/22 (36%); chi(2) = 9.3 (2 df) P = .01 with PA-B = 0.006; PB-C = 0.19; PA-C = 0.14. AVVSS scores improved in all groups as follows: A: 14.8 (9.3-22.6) to 6.4 (3.2-9.1), (P < .001); B: 15.8 (10.2-24.5) to 2.5 (1.1-3.7), (P < .001); and C: 15.1 (9.0-23.1) to 4.1 (2.3-6.8), (P < .001) and PA-B = 0.011, PA-C = 0.042. Patient satisfaction was highest in Group B. BK-EVLA was not associated with saphenous nerve injury. Conclusions. Extended EVLA is safe, increases spontaneous resolution of varicosities, and has a greater impact on symptom reduction. Similar benefits occurred after concomitant BF-GSV foam sclerotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 178
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条