Endovenous laser ablation: Does standard above-knee great saphenous vein ablation provide optimum results in patients with both above- and below-knee reflux? A randomized controlled trial

被引:76
|
作者
Theivacumar, Nadarajah S. [1 ]
Dellagrammaticas, Demos [1 ]
Mavor, Andrew I. D. [1 ]
Gough, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Infirm, Leeds Vasc Inst, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.062
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Following above-knee (AK) great saphenous vein (GSV) endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) 40% to 50% patients have residual varicosities. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) assesses whether more extensive GSV ablation enhances their resolution and influences symptom improvement. Method. Sixty-eight limbs (65 patients) with varicosities and above and below-knee GSV reflux were randomized to Group A: AK-EVLA (n = 23); Group B: EVLA mid-calf to groin (n = 23); and Group C: AK-EVLA, concomitant below-knee GSV foam sclerotherapy (n = 22). Primary outcomes were residual varicosities requiring sclerotherapy (6 weeks), improvement in Aberdeen varicose vein severity scores (AVVSS, 12 weeks), patient satisfaction, and complication rates. Results. EVLA ablated the treated GSV in all limbs. Sclerotherapy requirements were Group A: 14/23 (61%); Group B: 4/23 (17%); and Group C: 8/22 (36%); chi(2) = 9.3 (2 df) P = .01 with PA-B = 0.006; PB-C = 0.19; PA-C = 0.14. AVVSS scores improved in all groups as follows: A: 14.8 (9.3-22.6) to 6.4 (3.2-9.1), (P < .001); B: 15.8 (10.2-24.5) to 2.5 (1.1-3.7), (P < .001); and C: 15.1 (9.0-23.1) to 4.1 (2.3-6.8), (P < .001) and PA-B = 0.011, PA-C = 0.042. Patient satisfaction was highest in Group B. BK-EVLA was not associated with saphenous nerve injury. Conclusions. Extended EVLA is safe, increases spontaneous resolution of varicosities, and has a greater impact on symptom reduction. Similar benefits occurred after concomitant BF-GSV foam sclerotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 178
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Comparative study between endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with 1940 nm versus EVLA with 1470 nm for treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein and short saphenous vein: A randomized controlled trial
    Nasser, Mahmoud M.
    Ghoneim, Baker
    El Daly, Walid
    El Mahdy, Hossam
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [22] Comparable Effectiveness of Endovenous Laser Ablation and High Ligation With Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein Two-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study)
    Rass, Knuth
    Frings, Norbert
    Glowacki, Paul
    Hamsch, Corinna
    Graeber, Stefan
    Vogt, Thomas
    Tilgen, Wolfgang
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 148 (01) : 49 - 58
  • [23] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein with and without Ligation of the Sapheno-femoral Junction: 2-year Results
    Disselhoff, B. C. V. M.
    der Kinderen, D. J.
    Kelder, J. C.
    Moll, F. L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 36 (06) : 713 - 718
  • [24] Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Flessenkaemper, I.
    Hartmann, M.
    Stenger, D.
    Roll, S.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [25] Ten-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Saphenofemoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein With Endovenous Laser Ablation Using Local Tumescent Anesthesia
    Alozai, Tamana
    Eggen, Celine
    Mooij, Michael
    Pronk, Pascal
    van Vlijmen, Clarissa
    Unlu, Cagdas
    Gaastra, Menno
    Schreve, Michiel
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 74 (03) : E203 - E204
  • [26] Randomized Controlled Trial of Great Saphenous Vein Endovenous Laser Ablation by 1940-nm Radial Fiber Using High and Low Energy in Symptomatic Patients with Varicose Veins and Saphenofemoral Junction Incompetence
    Jagia, Priya
    Nandi, Debanjan
    Kumar, Sanjeev
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 77 (04) : 43S - 43S
  • [27] Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins
    van der Velden, S. K.
    Biemans, A. A. M.
    De Maeseneer, M. G. R.
    Kockaert, M. A.
    Cuypers, P. W.
    Hollestein, L. M.
    Neumann, H. A. M.
    Nijsten, T.
    van den Bos, R. R.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (10) : 1184 - 1194
  • [28] Letter Re: Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Aslam, Robina
    Handa, Ashok
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2014, 29 (08) : 538 - 538
  • [29] Same Site Recurrence is More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study)
    Rass, K.
    Frings, N.
    Glowacki, P.
    Graeber, S.
    Tilgen, W.
    Vogt, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 50 (05) : 648 - 656
  • [30] Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Sapheno-Femoral Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein with Endovenous Laser Ablation (980 nm) Using Local Tumescent Anaesthesia: One Year Results
    Pronk, P.
    Gauw, S. A.
    Mooij, M. C.
    Gaastra, M. T. W.
    Lawson, J. A.
    van Goethem, A. R.
    van Vlijmen-van Keulen, C. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 40 (05) : 649 - 656