Multimodal recognition of pain intensity and pain modality with machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Walter, S. [1 ]
Al-Hamadi, A. [2 ]
Gruss, S. [1 ]
Frisch, S. [1 ,3 ]
Traue, H. C. [1 ]
Werner, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Ulm, Klin Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapie, Sekt Med Psychol, Frauensteige 6, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Otto von Guericke Univ, Inst Informat & Kommunikat Tech, Fachgebiet Neuroinformat Tech, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Praxis Neurol & Psychiat, Leutkirch, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2020年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
Automated pain recognition; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Multimodality; Fusion algorithms;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-020-00468-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The objective recording of subjectively experienced pain is a problem that has not been sufficiently solved to date. In recent years, data sets have been created to train artificial intelligence algorithms to recognize patterns of pain intensity. The multimodal recognition of pain with machine learning could provide a way to reduce an over- or undersupply of analgesics, explicitly in patients with limited communication skills. Objectives This study investigated the methodology of automated multimodal recognition of pain intensity and modality using machine-learning techniques of artificial intelligence. Multimodal recognition rates of experimentally induced phasic electrical and heat pain stimuli were compared with uni- and bimodal recognition rates. Material and methods On the basis of the X-ITE Pain Database, healthy subjects were stimulated with phasic electro-induced pain and heat pain, and their corresponding pain responses were recorded with multimodal sensors (acoustic, video-based, physiological). After complex signal processing, machine-learning methods were used to calculate recognition rates with respect to pain intensity (baseline vs. pain threshold, pain tolerance, mean value of pain threshold and tolerance) and pain modality (electrical vs. heat). Finally, a statistical comparison of uni- vs. multimodal and bi- vs. multimodal detection rates was performed. Results With few exceptions, multimodal recognition of pain intensity rates was statistically superior to unimodal recognition rates, regardless of the pain modality. Multimodal pain recognition distinguished significantly better between heat and electro-induced pain. Further, multimodal recognition rates were predominantly superior to bimodal recognition rates. Conclusion Priority should be given to the multimodal approach to the recognition of pain intensity and modality compared with unimodality. Further clinical studies should clarify whether multimodal automated recognition of pain intensity and modality is in fact superior to bimodal recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 409
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] DRY NEEDLING AS A PAIN MODULATING MODALITY IN MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME
    Kumar, N. Ravinder
    Vadlamani, Kali Vara Prasad
    Moorty, G. V. S.
    Nirmala, D.
    Sarma, B. Janaki Rama
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (44): : 2877 - 2880
  • [42] AUTOGENIC TRAINING AS A MODALITY FOR PAIN CONTROL IN A PAIN TREATMENT CENTER
    OLSHAN, NH
    HARRIS, DH
    GOTTESMAN, JR
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1975, 56 (12): : 556 - 556
  • [43] PainMeter: Automatic Assessment of Pain Intensity Levels From Multiple Physiological Signals Using Machine Learning
    Albahdal, Da'ad
    Aljebreen, Wijdan
    Ibrahim, Dina M.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 48349 - 48365
  • [44] Multimodal Assessment of Body Pain in Orofacial Pain Patients
    Hawkins, James M.
    Schmidt, John E.
    Hargitai, Istvan A.
    Johnson, John F.
    Howard, Robin S.
    Bertrand, Peter M.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (05) : 961 - 969
  • [45] Multimodal pain treatment against acute and chronic pain
    Beerhalter, U.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2006, 55 (09): : 1004 - 1005
  • [46] From external assessment of pain to automated multimodal measurement of pain intensity Narrative review of state of research and clinical perspectives
    Frisch, S.
    Werner, P.
    Al-Hamadi, A.
    Traue, H. C.
    Gruss, S.
    Walter, S.
    SCHMERZ, 2020, 34 (05): : 376 - 387
  • [47] RECOGNITION OF PAIN
    NOLAN, AM
    LIVINGSTON, A
    WATERMAN, AE
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1986, 118 (26) : 735 - 735
  • [48] RECOGNITION OF PAIN
    MOLONY, V
    FLEETWOODWALKER, S
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1986, 118 (21) : 595 - 595
  • [49] RECOGNITION OF PAIN
    FLECKNELL, PA
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1986, 118 (20) : 568 - 568
  • [50] RECOGNITION OF PAIN
    WALL, PD
    VETERINARY RECORD, 1986, 118 (17) : 491 - 491