Multimodal recognition of pain intensity and pain modality with machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Walter, S. [1 ]
Al-Hamadi, A. [2 ]
Gruss, S. [1 ]
Frisch, S. [1 ,3 ]
Traue, H. C. [1 ]
Werner, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Ulm, Klin Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapie, Sekt Med Psychol, Frauensteige 6, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Otto von Guericke Univ, Inst Informat & Kommunikat Tech, Fachgebiet Neuroinformat Tech, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Praxis Neurol & Psychiat, Leutkirch, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2020年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
Automated pain recognition; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Multimodality; Fusion algorithms;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-020-00468-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The objective recording of subjectively experienced pain is a problem that has not been sufficiently solved to date. In recent years, data sets have been created to train artificial intelligence algorithms to recognize patterns of pain intensity. The multimodal recognition of pain with machine learning could provide a way to reduce an over- or undersupply of analgesics, explicitly in patients with limited communication skills. Objectives This study investigated the methodology of automated multimodal recognition of pain intensity and modality using machine-learning techniques of artificial intelligence. Multimodal recognition rates of experimentally induced phasic electrical and heat pain stimuli were compared with uni- and bimodal recognition rates. Material and methods On the basis of the X-ITE Pain Database, healthy subjects were stimulated with phasic electro-induced pain and heat pain, and their corresponding pain responses were recorded with multimodal sensors (acoustic, video-based, physiological). After complex signal processing, machine-learning methods were used to calculate recognition rates with respect to pain intensity (baseline vs. pain threshold, pain tolerance, mean value of pain threshold and tolerance) and pain modality (electrical vs. heat). Finally, a statistical comparison of uni- vs. multimodal and bi- vs. multimodal detection rates was performed. Results With few exceptions, multimodal recognition of pain intensity rates was statistically superior to unimodal recognition rates, regardless of the pain modality. Multimodal pain recognition distinguished significantly better between heat and electro-induced pain. Further, multimodal recognition rates were predominantly superior to bimodal recognition rates. Conclusion Priority should be given to the multimodal approach to the recognition of pain intensity and modality compared with unimodality. Further clinical studies should clarify whether multimodal automated recognition of pain intensity and modality is in fact superior to bimodal recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 409
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Support vector machine for automatic pain recognition
    Monwar, Md Maruf
    Rezaei, Siamak
    COMPUTATIONAL IMAGING VII, 2009, 7246
  • [22] Relevance Vector Machine Learning for Neonate Pain Intensity Assessment Using Digital Imaging
    Gholami, Behnood
    Haddad, Wassim M.
    Tannenbaum, Allen R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 57 (06) : 1457 - 1466
  • [23] Painless pain assessments with machine learning
    Ellen P. Neff
    Lab Animal, 2018, 47 : 149 - 149
  • [24] Pain Recognition and Intensity Classification Using Facial Expressions
    Shier, W. A.
    Yanushkevich, S.
    2016 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2016, : 3578 - 3583
  • [25] Multimodal Pain Level Recognition using Majority Voting Technique
    Salah, Amir
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Abbas, Hazem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS (ICCES), 2018, : 307 - 312
  • [26] Pain perception in major depression depends on pain modality
    Bär, KJ
    Brehm, S
    Boettger, MK
    Boettger, S
    Wagner, G
    Sauer, H
    PAIN, 2005, 117 (1-2) : 97 - 103
  • [27] Towards Machine Recognition of Facial Expressions of Pain in Horses
    Andersen, Pia Haubro
    Broome, Sofia
    Rashid, Maheen
    Lundblad, Johan
    Ask, Katrina
    Li, Zhenghong
    Hernlund, Elin
    Rhodin, Marie
    Kjellstrom, Hedvig
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [28] Pain Intensity Assessment and Selection of Analgesic Modality in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Gasik, Robert
    Styczynski, Tadeusz
    JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN, 2010, 18 (02): : 204 - 205
  • [29] Joyful: Joint Modality Fusion and Graph Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Emotion Recognition
    Li, Dongyuan
    Wang, Yusong
    Funakoshi, Kotaro
    Okumura, Manabu
    2023 CONFERENCE ON EMPIRICAL METHODS IN NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING (EMNLP 2023), 2023, : 16051 - 16069
  • [30] Accelerating chest pain evaluation with machine learning
    Thangaraj, Phyllis M.
    Khera, Rohan
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2023, 12 (11) : 753 - 754