Multimodal recognition of pain intensity and pain modality with machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Walter, S. [1 ]
Al-Hamadi, A. [2 ]
Gruss, S. [1 ]
Frisch, S. [1 ,3 ]
Traue, H. C. [1 ]
Werner, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Ulm, Klin Psychosomat Med & Psychotherapie, Sekt Med Psychol, Frauensteige 6, D-89075 Ulm, Germany
[2] Otto von Guericke Univ, Inst Informat & Kommunikat Tech, Fachgebiet Neuroinformat Tech, Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Praxis Neurol & Psychiat, Leutkirch, Germany
来源
SCHMERZ | 2020年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
Automated pain recognition; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Multimodality; Fusion algorithms;
D O I
10.1007/s00482-020-00468-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background The objective recording of subjectively experienced pain is a problem that has not been sufficiently solved to date. In recent years, data sets have been created to train artificial intelligence algorithms to recognize patterns of pain intensity. The multimodal recognition of pain with machine learning could provide a way to reduce an over- or undersupply of analgesics, explicitly in patients with limited communication skills. Objectives This study investigated the methodology of automated multimodal recognition of pain intensity and modality using machine-learning techniques of artificial intelligence. Multimodal recognition rates of experimentally induced phasic electrical and heat pain stimuli were compared with uni- and bimodal recognition rates. Material and methods On the basis of the X-ITE Pain Database, healthy subjects were stimulated with phasic electro-induced pain and heat pain, and their corresponding pain responses were recorded with multimodal sensors (acoustic, video-based, physiological). After complex signal processing, machine-learning methods were used to calculate recognition rates with respect to pain intensity (baseline vs. pain threshold, pain tolerance, mean value of pain threshold and tolerance) and pain modality (electrical vs. heat). Finally, a statistical comparison of uni- vs. multimodal and bi- vs. multimodal detection rates was performed. Results With few exceptions, multimodal recognition of pain intensity rates was statistically superior to unimodal recognition rates, regardless of the pain modality. Multimodal pain recognition distinguished significantly better between heat and electro-induced pain. Further, multimodal recognition rates were predominantly superior to bimodal recognition rates. Conclusion Priority should be given to the multimodal approach to the recognition of pain intensity and modality compared with unimodality. Further clinical studies should clarify whether multimodal automated recognition of pain intensity and modality is in fact superior to bimodal recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 409
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: Machine Learning Approach
    Subramanian, Ajan
    Cao, Rui
    Naeini, Emad Kasaeyan
    Aqajari, Seyed Amir Hossein
    Hughes, D.
    Calderon, Michael-David
    Zheng, Kai
    Dutt, Nikil
    Liljeberg, Pasi
    Nelson, Ariana M.
    Rahmani, Amir M.
    Salanter, Sanna
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2025, 9
  • [2] Multimodale Erkennung von Schmerzintensität und -modalität mit maschinellen LernverfahrenMultimodal recognition of pain intensity and pain modality with machine learning
    S. Walter
    A. Al-Hamadi
    S. Gruss
    S. Frisch
    H. C. Traue
    P. Werner
    Der Schmerz, 2020, 34 (5) : 400 - 409
  • [3] An efficient machine-learning model based on data augmentation for pain intensity recognition
    Al-Qerem, Ahmad
    EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2020, 21 (04) : 241 - 257
  • [4] PAIN RECOGNITION AND INTENSITY RATING BASED ON COMPARATIVE LEARNING
    Werner, Philipp
    Al-Hamadi, Ayoub
    Niese, Robert
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2012), 2012, : 2313 - 2316
  • [5] Quantifying Pain Location and Intensity with Multimodal Pain Body Diagrams
    Kwong, Jereen
    Lin, Joanna
    Leriche, Ryan
    Wozny, Thomas A.
    Shaughnessy, Ana
    Schmitgen, Ashlyn
    Shirvalkar, Prasad
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2023, (197):
  • [6] Keynote: Machine learning and data analysis of multimodal affective and pain data
    Schwenker, Friedhelm
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS AND OTHER AFFILIATED EVENTS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2021, : 452 - 452
  • [7] PAIN Painless pain assessments with machine learning
    Neff, Ellen P.
    LAB ANIMAL, 2018, 47 (06) : 149 - 149
  • [8] A Curriculum Learning Approach for Pain Intensity Recognition from Facial Expressions
    Mallol-Ragolta, Adria
    Liu, Shuo
    Cummins, Nicholas
    Schuller, Bjoern
    2020 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATIC FACE AND GESTURE RECOGNITION (FG 2020), 2020, : 829 - 833
  • [9] Twofold-Multimodal Pain Recognition with the X-ITE Pain Database
    Werner, Philipp
    Al-Hamadi, Ayoub
    Gruss, Sascha
    Walter, Steffen
    2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION WORKSHOPS AND DEMOS (ACIIW), 2019, : 290 - 296
  • [10] Machine Learning-Based Pain Intensity Estimation: Where Pattern Recognition Meets Chaos Theory-An Example Based on the BioVid Heat Pain Database
    Bellmann, Peter
    Thiam, Patrick
    Kestler, Hans A.
    Schwenker, Friedhelm
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 102770 - 102777