The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching

被引:17
|
作者
Kreutzfeldt, Magali [1 ]
Stephan, Denise N. [1 ]
Sturm, Walter [2 ]
Willmes, Klaus [2 ]
Koch, Iring [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Psychol, D-52066 Aachen, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Fac Med, Sect Neuropsychol, Dept Neurol, D-52066 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Crossmodal selective attention; Modality switch costs; Congruency effect; Visual dominance; Dimensional overlap; STIMULUS-RESPONSE COMPATIBILITY; TASK; MODALITY; REPRESENTATION; INTERFERENCE; DOMINANCE; COSTS; SNARC;
D O I
10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.12.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Crossmodal selective attention was investigated in a cued task switching paradigm using bimodal visual and auditory stimulation. A cue indicated the imperative modality. Three levels of spatial S-R associations were established following perceptual (location), structural (numerical), and conceptual (verbal) set-level compatibility. In Experiment 1, participants switched attention between the auditory and visual modality either with a spatial-location or spatial-numerical stimulus set. In the spatial-location set, participants performed a localization judgment on left vs. right presented stimuli, whereas the spatial-numerical set required a magnitude judgment about a visually or auditorily presented number word. Single-modality blocks with unimodal stimuli were included as a control condition. In Experiment 2, the spatial-numerical stimulus set was replaced by a spatial-verbal stimulus set using direction words (e.g., "left"). RT data showed modality switch costs, which were asymmetric across modalities in the spatial-numerical and spatial-verbal stimulus set (i.e., larger for auditory than for visual stimuli), and congruency effects, which were asymmetric primarily in the spatial-location stimulus set (i.e., larger for auditory than for visual stimuli). This pattern of effects suggests task-dependent visual dominance. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 76
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention
    Macaluso, E
    Frith, CD
    Driver, J
    SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5482) : 1206 - 1208
  • [32] SPATIAL ATTENTION IS CROSSMODAL - AN EVOKED-POTENTIAL STUDY
    MIYAUCHI, S
    HIKOSAKA, O
    SHIMOJO, S
    OKAMURA, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1993, 34 (04) : 1234 - 1234
  • [33] Crossmodal bipolar attention for multimodal classification on social media
    Cheung, Tsun-hin
    Lam, Kin -man
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 514 : 1 - 12
  • [34] Towards Crossmodal Learning for Smooth Multimodal Attention Orientation
    Haarslev, Frederik
    Docherty, David
    Suvei, Stefan-Daniel
    Juel, William Kristian
    Bodenhagen, Leon
    Shaikh, Danish
    Krueger, Norbert
    Manoonpong, Poramate
    SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2018, 2018, 11357 : 318 - 328
  • [35] CROSSMODAL DIVIDED ATTENTION IN RATS - EFFECTS OF CHLORDIAZEPOXIDE AND SCOPOLAMINE
    MCGAUGHY, J
    TURCHI, J
    SARTER, M
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 115 (1-2) : 213 - 220
  • [36] The Crossmodal Effect of Attention on Preferences: Facilitation versus Impairment
    Shen, Hao
    Sengupta, Jaideep
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2014, 40 (05) : 885 - 903
  • [37] Exogenous orienting of crossmodal attention in 3-D space: Support for a depth-aware crossmodal attentional system
    Nathan Van der Stoep
    Tanja C. W. Nijboer
    Stefan Van der Stigchel
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2014, 21 : 708 - 714
  • [38] Exogenous orienting of crossmodal attention in 3-D space: Support for a depth-aware crossmodal attentional system
    Van der Stoep, Nathan
    Nijboer, Tanja C. W.
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2014, 21 (03) : 708 - 714
  • [39] Crossmodal modulation of auditory attention by visual emotional cues: The role of attentional engagement and disengagement
    Harrison, Neil
    Woodhouse, Rob
    PERCEPTION, 2015, 44 : 113 - 113
  • [40] Crossmodal attention effects on brain responses to different stimulus classes
    Nager, W
    Estorf, K
    Münte, TF
    BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 7 (1)