Considerations and Methods for Usability Testing with Children

被引:1
|
作者
Andersen, Malene Hjortboe [1 ]
Khalid, Md. Saifuddin [1 ]
Brooks, Eva Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept & Learning & Philosophy, Fac Humanities, Kroghstr 3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Child-computer interaction; Usability testing; Usability evaluation; Usability testing methods;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-55834-9_27
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the authors draw on methods used in the field of interaction design, emphasizing a user-centred design approach including methods such as usability testing, design metaphors, interview with users, video observations, focus groups, and think aloud sessions. However, a challenge of these methods is that they are designed for adults and are not necessarily appropriate to investigations including children. The guiding questions for this systematic literature review are (1) the motivation for conducting usability tests with children, and (2) the kind of methodological, practical, and ethical considerations that should be considered when involving children in usability studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist and PRISMA flow diagram are applied in order to assure the quality of the process of this investigation. Nine articles are analyzed and then synthesized by applying the constant comparative method. The synthesis of the literature review is based on the identified thematic priorities, which are categorized as follows: (1) the motivation for involving children as test persons in design processes, (2) definitions of usability, (3) practical considerations, (4) methodological considerations, and (5) ethical considerations.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the assessment of usability testing methods for children
    Markopoulos, P
    Bekker, M
    INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS, 2003, 15 (02) : 227 - 243
  • [2] Usability testing with children: an application of Pedactice and Ticese methods
    Carusi, Alessandra
    Mont'Alvao, Claudia
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 41 : 822 - 826
  • [3] Experiences in Ethical Usability Testing with Children
    Ellis, Kirsten
    Quigley, Marian
    Power, Mark
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 1 (03) : 1 - 13
  • [4] A Comparison of Usability Testing Methods in Smartphone Evaluation
    Hendradewa, Andrie Pasca
    Yassierli
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 18 (02): : 154 - 162
  • [5] Usability testing in libraries: Methods, limitations, and implications
    Emanuel, J. (emanuelj@illinois.edu), 1600, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. (29):
  • [6] Considerations of pharmacogenetic testing in children
    Haga, Susanne B.
    Solomon, Benjamin D.
    PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2016, 17 (09) : 975 - 977
  • [7] A Comparison of Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Usability Testing Methods
    Alhadreti, Obead
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2022, 38 (03) : 289 - 297
  • [8] Testing Usability of Different Implementations for VR Interaction Methods
    Kopel, Marek
    Walczynski, Maciej
    Wyrostek, Piotr
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE, ICCCI 2024, PT II, 2024, 2166 : 287 - 300
  • [9] USABILITY TESTING OF CARTOGRAPHIC VISUALIZATIONS: PRINCIPLES AND RESEARCH METHODS
    Sterba, Zbynek
    Sasinka, Cenek
    Stachon, Zdenek
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CARTOGRAPHY AND GIS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2014, : 333 - 340
  • [10] Comparative Study of Heuristic Evaluation and Usability Testing Methods
    Thyvalikakath, Thankam Paul
    Monaco, Valerie
    Thambuganipalle, Himabindu
    Schleyer, Titus
    ADVANCES IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION IN HEALTH, 2009, 143 : 322 - +