What works for whom: A realist synthesis of neighbourhood interventions for families in the community

被引:4
|
作者
Rumping, S. M. [1 ,2 ]
Boendermaker, L. [1 ,2 ]
Fukkink, R. G. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Appl Res Social Work & Law, Postbus 1025, NL-1000 BA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Postbus 1025, NL-1000 BA Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Appl Sci, Wibautstr 2-4, NL-1091 GM Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Wibautstr 2-4, NL-1091 GM Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prevention; Neighborhood; Community-based; Social support; Social interactions; Interventions; PREVENTION; CHILDREN; CARE; MECHANISMS; CHALLENGES; PARENTS; LESSONS; SCIENCE; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106365
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Neighbourhood interventions are important for creating supportive structures for parents and children and for other community members. Little is known, however, about what works for whom in what situation. The aim of this study was to gain a better understanding of what works for whom in community interventions in the neighbourhood. Realist synthesis was used as a review methodology to examine community interventions. Six databases were searched for studies published between January 1st, 2000 and May 8th, 2020 and 28 community programs reported in 34 publications were included. Multiple rounds of coding and several discussions with experts and the project team were conducted to analyze these studies and programs, and to understand underlying assumptions of neighbourhood interventions. This resulted in the definition of ten important mechanisms of change in specific contexts. These were found on two levels: on an interpersonal level (e.g. social support) and on a community level (e.g. social norms). Positive mechanisms of change varied from supportive professionals to participants in the intervention, to co-production in developing the intervention. Negative mechanisms were only found on the community level and were related to professionals' and community members' skills. Mechanisms of change were found to be related to specific contexts, such as implementation strategies and the type of intervention. Professionals and municipalities can use these mechanisms of change to improve their interventions and neighbourhood practices.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complex interventions: What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? A rapid realist review
    Naughton, Stephen
    Rapaport, Penny
    Ali, Afia
    Elahi, Farah
    Lahab, Maria
    Hassiotis, Angela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1330 - 1330
  • [2] Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review
    Schlief, Merle
    Saunders, Katherine R. K.
    Appleton, Rebecca
    Barnett, Phoebe
    Juan, Norha Vera San
    Foye, Una
    Olive, Rachel Rowan
    Machin, Karen
    Shah, Prisha
    Chipp, Beverley
    Lyons, Natasha
    Tamworth, Camilla
    Persaud, Karen
    Badhan, Monika
    Black, Carrie -Ann
    Sin, Jacqueline
    Riches, Simon
    Graham, Tom
    Greening, Jeremy
    Pirani, Farida
    Griffiths, Raza
    Jeynes, Tamar
    McCabe, Rose
    Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
    Simpson, Alan
    Needle, Justin J.
    Trevillion, Kylee
    Johnson, Sonia
    [J]. INTERACTIVE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [3] Physical activity interventions for inpatients in secure mental health settings: what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why? A protocol for a realist synthesis
    Keel, Toby
    Machaczek, Katarzyna
    King, James A.
    Breen, Kieran
    Stubbs, Brendon
    Kinnafick, Florence
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [4] Supporting active engagement of adults with intellectual disabilities in lifestyle modification interventions: a realist evidence synthesis of what works, for whom, in what context and why
    Westrop, S. C.
    Rana, D.
    Jaiswal, N.
    Wu, O.
    McGarty, A. M.
    Melville, C.
    Ells, L.
    Lally, P.
    McEwan, M.
    Harris, L.
    Germeni, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (04) : 293 - 316
  • [5] Participatory ergonomics: What works for whom and why? A realist review
    Hansen, Anne Faber
    Hasle, Peter
    Caroly, Sandrine
    Reinhold, Karin
    Jarvis, Marina
    Herrig, Astrid Overgaard
    Heiberg, Bibi Dige
    Sogaard, Karen
    Punnett, Laura
    Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (01) : 13 - 33
  • [6] Early years interventions to improve child health and wellbeing: what works, for whom and in what circumstances? Protocol for a realist review
    Coles, Emma
    Cheyne, Helen
    Daniel, Brigid
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, 4
  • [7] What works, for whom and under what circumstances? Using realist methodology to evaluate complex interventions in nursing: A scoping review
    Palm, Rebecca
    Hochmuth, Alexander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 109
  • [8] Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review
    Brown, Sarah
    Lhussier, Monique
    Dalkin, Sonia M.
    Eaton, Simon
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (14) : 2250 - 2266
  • [9] Interventions to address unprofessional behaviours between staff in acute care: what works for whom and why? A realist review
    Maben, Jill
    Aunger, Justin Avery
    Abrams, Ruth
    Wright, Judy M.
    Pearson, Mark
    Westbrook, Johanna I.
    Jones, Aled
    Mannion, Russell
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [10] Interventions to address unprofessional behaviours between staff in acute care: what works for whom and why? A realist review
    Jill Maben
    Justin Avery Aunger
    Ruth Abrams
    Judy M. Wright
    Mark Pearson
    Johanna I. Westbrook
    Aled Jones
    Russell Mannion
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 21