Use of Accessible Examination Tables in the Primary Care Setting: A Survey of Physical Evaluations and Patient Attitudes

被引:10
|
作者
Morris, Megan A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maragh-Bass, Allysha C. [3 ]
Griffin, Joan M. [1 ,2 ]
Rutten, Lila J. Finney [1 ,2 ]
Lagu, Tara [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Phelan, Sean [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Robert D &Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deliv, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Baystate Med Ctr, Ctr Qual Care Res, Springfield, MA USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[6] Baystate Med Ctr, Div Hosp Med, Springfield, MA USA
关键词
disability; primary care; access to care; disparity; HEALTH INTERVIEW SURVEY; BREAST-CANCER; UNITED-STATES; MOBILITY IMPAIRMENTS; PREVENTIVE SERVICES; DISABILITIES; WOMEN; DISPARITIES; QUALITY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-017-4155-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Accessible diagnostic equipment, including height-adjustable examination tables, is necessary to accommodate patients with disabilities. Studies demonstrate that only a minority of clinics provide accessible equipment. For clinics with this equipment, no studies have examined the use of such equipment in routine clinical care. In primary care clinics with and without height-adjustable examination tables, we compared the frequency and variation in physical evaluations on examination tables and patients' perceptions of quality care. Survey administered to patients at two primary care clinics in Rochester, MN, in 2015. One clinic had height-adjustable examination tables in every exam room; the other clinic had none. A total of 399 English-speaking adult primary care patients (61% participation). Participants were asked whether they were physically evaluated on a table during their clinical encounter. In addition, they completed two subscales of the Patient Perception of Quality of Care survey: Perceptions of Provider's Bedside Manner and Perceptions of Provider's Work. Overall, there were no differences between clinics in the likelihood of patients being examined on an exam table or in their perceptions of quality of care. Across both clinics, patients who reported a disability were 27% less likely to be examined on a table, were less likely to rate their provider's bedside manner favorably (74% vs. 59%) and to have positive perceptions of their provider's work (46% vs. 32%) than patients without disabilities. The presence of accessible medical equipment was not associated with care delivered to patients. While this might not be meaningful for most patients, it could be problematic for patients with disabilities, who are less likely to be examined. Therefore, accessible equipment alone may not be sufficient to reduce disparities in the care experience. Provider- and organization-level factors must thus be considered in efforts to provide equitable care to patients with disabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] COMPARING THE TEACHING OF PHYSICAL DIAGNOSIS IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING AND A HOSPITAL SETTING
    GUPTA, KL
    GAMBERT, SR
    GRAYSON, MS
    LUGO, JJ
    SOZZO, AM
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1993, 68 (04) : 311 - 311
  • [42] Associations of retention on buprenorphine for opioid use disorder with patient characteristics and models of care in the primary care setting
    Bailey, Steffani R.
    Lucas, Jennifer A.
    Angier, Heather
    Cantone, Rebecca E.
    Fleishman, Joan
    Garvey, Brian
    Cohen, Deborah J.
    Rdesinski, Rebecca E.
    Gordon, Leah
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 2021, 131
  • [43] Use of Accessible Weight Scales and Examination Tables/Chairs for Patients with Significant Mobility Limitations by Physicians Nationwide
    Iezzoni, Lisa I.
    Rao, Sowmya R.
    Ressalam, Julie
    Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
    Donelan, Karen
    Agaronnik, Nicole
    Lagu, Tara
    Campbell, Eric G.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2021, 47 (10): : 615 - 626
  • [44] Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care
    Donner-Banzhoff, N
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 22 (05) : 579 - 579
  • [45] Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care
    Oudega, R
    Moons, KGM
    Hoes, AW
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 22 (01) : 86 - 91
  • [46] Individual Patient Factors Associated with the Use of Physical or Digital Primary Care in Sweden
    Soderberg, Daniel
    Bonn, Stephanie E.
    Sjoblom, Linnea
    Dahlgren, Anna
    Muli, Irene
    Amer-Wahlin, Isis
    Bertilson, Bo C.
    Farrokhnia, Nasim
    Hvitfeldt, Helena
    Taloyan, Marina
    Hagglund, Maria
    Lagerros, Ylva Trolle
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2024, 30 (05) : 1289 - 1296
  • [48] MISTAKES IN THE AMBULATORY CARE SETTING: A SURVEY OF PATIENT PERCEPTIONS
    Kistler, C. E.
    Walter, L.
    Mitchell, C. M.
    Sloane, P. D.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 : 124 - 124
  • [49] Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care
    Delaney, BC
    Hyde, CJ
    McManus, RJ
    Wilson, S
    Fitzmaurice, DA
    Jowett, S
    Tobias, R
    Thorpe, GH
    Hobbs, FDR
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7213): : 824 - 827
  • [50] A survey of doctors' attitudes towards the use of smart phone communication as a tool for patient care and management
    Bangash, H.
    Richards, T.
    Hayne, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 : 68 - 68