共 1 条
Use of Accessible Weight Scales and Examination Tables/Chairs for Patients with Significant Mobility Limitations by Physicians Nationwide
被引:16
|作者:
Iezzoni, Lisa I.
[1
,2
]
Rao, Sowmya R.
[3
,4
]
Ressalam, Julie
[5
]
Bolcic-Jankovic, Dragana
[6
]
Donelan, Karen
[7
,8
,9
]
Agaronnik, Nicole
[7
]
Lagu, Tara
[10
,11
]
Campbell, Eric G.
[12
,13
]
机构:
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mongan Inst, Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Biostat Ctr, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Med, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[6] Univ Massachusetts Boston, Res, Boston, MA USA
[7] Hlth Policy Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[9] Brandeis Univ, Heller Sch Social Policy & Management, Schneider Inst Hlth Policy, US Hlth Policy, Waltham, MA USA
[10] Northwestern Feinberg Sch Med, Inst Publ Hlth & Med, Ctr Hlth Serv & Outcomes Res, Chicago, IL USA
[11] Northwestern Feinberg Sch Med, Div Hosp Med, Chicago, IL USA
[12] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Med, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[13] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth & Humanities, Res, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源:
关键词:
PRIMARY-CARE;
WHEELCHAIR USERS;
EXAMINATION TABLES;
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT;
PREGNANT-WOMEN;
BREAST-CANCER;
PRENATAL-CARE;
DISABILITIES;
HEALTH;
PERCEPTIONS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.06.005
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Mobility limitations are the most common disability type among the 61 million Americans with disability. Studies of patients with mobility limitations suggest that inaccessible medical diagnostic equipment poses significant barriers to care. Methods: The study team surveyed randomly selected US physicians nationwide representing seven specialties about their reported use of accessible weight scales and exam tables/chairs when caring for patients with mobility limitations. A descriptive analysis of responses was performed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to examine associations between accessible equipment and participants' characteristics. Results: The 714 participants (survey response rate = 61.0%) were primarily male, White, and urban, and had practiced for 20 or more years. Among those reporting routinely recording patients' weights (n = 399), only 22.6% (standard error [SE] = 2.2) reported always or usually using accessible weight scales for patients with significant mobility limitations. To determine weights of patients with mobility limitations, 8.1% always, 24.3% usually, and 40.0% sometimes asked patients. Physicians practicing >= 20 years were much less likely than other physicians to use accessible weight scales: odds ratio (OR) = 0.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.99). Among participants seeing patients with significant mobility limitations (n = 584), only 40.3% (SE = 2.2) always or usually used accessible exam tables or chairs. Specialists were much more likely than primary care physicians to use accessible exam tables/chairs: OR = 1.96 (95% CI = 1.29-2.99). Conclusion: More than 30 years after enactment of the Americans with Disabilities Act, most physicians surveyed do not use accessible equipment for routine care of patients with chronic significant mobility limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 626
页数:12
相关论文