Calibration and evaluation of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System for improved wildland fire danger rating in the United Kingdom

被引:43
|
作者
de Jong, Mark C. [1 ]
Wooster, Martin J. [1 ,2 ]
Kitchen, Karl [3 ]
Manley, Cathy [4 ]
Gazzard, Rob [5 ]
McCall, Frank F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] NCEO, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Forestry Commiss England, 620 Bristol Business Pk,Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1EJ, Avon, England
[5] Forestry Commiss England, Farnham GU10 4LS, Surrey, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
FUEL MOISTURE-CONTENT; RISK; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION; VEGETATION; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/nhess-16-1217-2016
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Wildfires in the United Kingdom (UK) pose a threat to people, infrastructure and the natural environment. During periods of particularly fire-prone weather, wildfires can occur simultaneously across large areas, placing considerable stress upon the resources of fire and rescue services. Fire danger rating systems (FDRSs) attempt to anticipate periods of heightened fire risk, primarily for early-warning and preparedness purposes. The UK FDRS, termed the Met Office Fire Severity Index (MOFSI), is based on the Fire Weather Index (FWI) component of the Canadian Forest FWI System. The MOFSI currently provides daily operational mapping of landscape fire danger across England and Wales using a simple thresholding of the final FWI component of the Canadian FWI System. However, it is known that the system has scope for improvement. Here we explore a climatology of the six FWI System components across the UK (i.e. extending to Scotland and Northern Ireland), calculated from daily 2km x 2km gridded numerical weather prediction data and supplemented by long-term meteorological station observations. We used this climatology to develop a percentile-based calibration of the FWI System, optimised for UK conditions. We find this approach to be well justified, as the values of the "raw" uncalibrated FWI components corresponding to a very "extreme" (99th percentile) fire danger situation vary by more than an order of magnitude across the country. Therefore, a simple thresholding of the uncalibrated component values (as is currently applied in the MOFSI) may incur large errors of omission and commission with respect to the identification of periods of significantly elevated fire danger. We evaluate our approach to enhancing UK fire danger rating using records of wildfire occurrence and find that the Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Initial Spread Index (ISI) and FWI components of the FWI System generally have the greatest predictive skill for landscape fire activity across Great Britain, with performance varying seasonally and by land cover type. At the height of the most recent severe wildfire period in the UK (2 May 2011), 50% of all wildfires occurred in areas where the FWI component exceeded the 99th percentile. When all wildfire events during the 2010-2012 period are considered, the 75th, 90th and 99th percentiles of at least one FWI component were exceeded during 85, 61 and 18% of all wildfires respectively. Overall, we demonstrate the significant advantages of using a percentile-based calibration approach for classifying UK fire danger, and believe that our findings provide useful insights for future development of the current operational MOFSI UK FDRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1237
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] cffdrs: an R package for the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System (vol 6, 5, 2017)
    Wang, Xianli
    Wotton, B. Mike
    Cantin, Alan S.
    Parisien, Marc-Andre
    Anderson, Kerry
    Moore, Brett
    Flannigan, Mike D.
    ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2018, 7
  • [32] Wildfires and the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index system for the Daxing'anling region of China
    Tian, Xiaorui
    McRae, Douglas J.
    Jin, Jizhong
    Shu, Lifu
    Zhao, Fengjun
    Wang, Mingyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2011, 20 (08) : 963 - 973
  • [33] FIRE WEATHER INDEX AND FOREST FIRE DANGER MAPPING: INSIGHTS FROM A CASE STUDY IN ANTALYA - MANAVGAT FOREST, TURKIYE
    Atalay, H.
    Dervisoglu, A.
    Sunar, F.
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOINFORMATION ADVANCES, GEOADVANCES 2024, VOL. 48-4, 2024, : 53 - 59
  • [34] Development and Application of a Forest Fire Danger Rating System in South Korea
    Won, Myoung Soo
    Lee, Si Young
    Lee, Myung Bo
    Ohga, Shoji
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE KYUSHU UNIVERSITY, 2010, 55 (02): : 221 - 229
  • [35] The Canadian fire weather index system and wildfire activity in the Karst forest management area, Slovenia
    Sturm, Tomaz
    Fernandes, Paulo M.
    Sumrada, Rados
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 131 (03) : 829 - 834
  • [36] The Canadian fire weather index system and wildfire activity in the Karst forest management area, Slovenia
    Tomaž Šturm
    Paulo M. Fernandes
    Radoš Šumrada
    European Journal of Forest Research, 2012, 131 : 829 - 834
  • [37] Application of the wildland fire emissions inventory system to estimate fire emissions on forest lands of the United States
    Smith, James E.
    Billmire, Michael
    French, Nancy H. F.
    Domke, Grant M.
    CARBON BALANCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [38] Enhancement of Fire Danger Rating System for a Better Land/Forest Fire Warning in South Sumatera Province - Indonesia
    Khomarudin, Muhammad Rokhis
    Roswintiarti, Orbita
    Prasasti, Indah
    Kartika, Tatik
    Nugroho, Udhi Catur
    Aziz, Kholifatul
    Seran, Virgilius Rivan
    EIGHTH GEOINFORMATION SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM 2023: GEOINFORMATION SCIENCE FOR SUSTAINABLE PLANET, 2024, 12977
  • [39] A Markov chain model of day to day changes in the Canadian forest Fire Weather Index
    Martell, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 1999, 9 (04) : 265 - 273
  • [40] Evaluation of Gridded Precipitation Data and Interpolation Methods for Forest Fire Danger Rating in Alberta, Canada
    Cai, Xinli
    Wang, Xianli
    Jain, Piyush
    Flannigan, Mike D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (01) : 3 - 17