Calibration and evaluation of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System for improved wildland fire danger rating in the United Kingdom

被引:43
|
作者
de Jong, Mark C. [1 ]
Wooster, Martin J. [1 ,2 ]
Kitchen, Karl [3 ]
Manley, Cathy [4 ]
Gazzard, Rob [5 ]
McCall, Frank F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London WC2R 2LS, England
[2] NCEO, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Forestry Commiss England, 620 Bristol Business Pk,Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1EJ, Avon, England
[5] Forestry Commiss England, Farnham GU10 4LS, Surrey, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
FUEL MOISTURE-CONTENT; RISK; SENSITIVITY; MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION; VEGETATION; FUTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.5194/nhess-16-1217-2016
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Wildfires in the United Kingdom (UK) pose a threat to people, infrastructure and the natural environment. During periods of particularly fire-prone weather, wildfires can occur simultaneously across large areas, placing considerable stress upon the resources of fire and rescue services. Fire danger rating systems (FDRSs) attempt to anticipate periods of heightened fire risk, primarily for early-warning and preparedness purposes. The UK FDRS, termed the Met Office Fire Severity Index (MOFSI), is based on the Fire Weather Index (FWI) component of the Canadian Forest FWI System. The MOFSI currently provides daily operational mapping of landscape fire danger across England and Wales using a simple thresholding of the final FWI component of the Canadian FWI System. However, it is known that the system has scope for improvement. Here we explore a climatology of the six FWI System components across the UK (i.e. extending to Scotland and Northern Ireland), calculated from daily 2km x 2km gridded numerical weather prediction data and supplemented by long-term meteorological station observations. We used this climatology to develop a percentile-based calibration of the FWI System, optimised for UK conditions. We find this approach to be well justified, as the values of the "raw" uncalibrated FWI components corresponding to a very "extreme" (99th percentile) fire danger situation vary by more than an order of magnitude across the country. Therefore, a simple thresholding of the uncalibrated component values (as is currently applied in the MOFSI) may incur large errors of omission and commission with respect to the identification of periods of significantly elevated fire danger. We evaluate our approach to enhancing UK fire danger rating using records of wildfire occurrence and find that the Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Initial Spread Index (ISI) and FWI components of the FWI System generally have the greatest predictive skill for landscape fire activity across Great Britain, with performance varying seasonally and by land cover type. At the height of the most recent severe wildfire period in the UK (2 May 2011), 50% of all wildfires occurred in areas where the FWI component exceeded the 99th percentile. When all wildfire events during the 2010-2012 period are considered, the 75th, 90th and 99th percentiles of at least one FWI component were exceeded during 85, 61 and 18% of all wildfires respectively. Overall, we demonstrate the significant advantages of using a percentile-based calibration approach for classifying UK fire danger, and believe that our findings provide useful insights for future development of the current operational MOFSI UK FDRS.
引用
收藏
页码:1217 / 1237
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Interpreting and using outputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in research applications
    Wotton, B. Mike
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2009, 16 (02) : 107 - 131
  • [22] Interpreting and using outputs from the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System in research applications
    B. Mike Wotton
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2009, 16 : 107 - 131
  • [23] Examining the utility of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System in boreal peatlands
    Waddington, J. M.
    Thompson, D. K.
    Wotton, M.
    Quinton, W. L.
    Flannigan, M. D.
    Benscoter, B. W.
    Baisley, S. A.
    Turetsky, M. R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 42 (01) : 47 - 58
  • [24] Fire weather index system components for large fires in the Canadian boreal forest
    Amiro, BD
    Logan, KA
    Wotton, BM
    Flannigan, MD
    Todd, JB
    Stocks, BJ
    Martell, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2004, 13 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [25] Fire activity in Portugal and its relationship to weather and the Canadian Fire Weather Index System
    Carvalho, A.
    Flannigan, M. D.
    Logan, K.
    Miranda, A. I.
    Borrego, C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2008, 17 (03) : 328 - 338
  • [26] A Conceptual Interpretation of the Drought Code of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System
    Miller, Eric A.
    FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2020, 3 (02): : 1 - 8
  • [27] Evaluation of the Canadian fire weather index system in an eastern Mediterranean environment
    Dimitrakopoulos, A. P.
    Bemmerzouk, A. M.
    Mitsopoulos, I. D.
    METEOROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 18 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [28] An index for tracking sheltered forest floor moisture within the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System
    Wotton, BM
    Stocks, BJ
    Martell, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2005, 14 (02) : 169 - 182
  • [29] The Canadian versus the National Forest Fire Danger Rating Systems tested in Mediterranean forests fire Crete, Greece
    Elhag, Mohamed
    Boteva, Silvena
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (04) : 4973 - 4983
  • [30] The Canadian versus the National Forest Fire Danger Rating Systems tested in Mediterranean forests fire Crete, Greece
    Mohamed Elhag
    Silvena Boteva
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 4973 - 4983