On the origin of the difference between the runaway velocities of the OB-supergiant X-ray binaries and the Be/X-ray binaries

被引:0
|
作者
van den Heuvel, EPJ
Portegies Zwart, S
Bhattacharya, D
Kaper, L
机构
[1] Astron Inst Anton Pannekoek, NL-1098 SJ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Theoret Phys, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[4] Raman Res Inst, Bangalore 560080, Karnataka, India
来源
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS | 2000年 / 364卷 / 02期
关键词
stars : binaries : close; stars : early-type; stars; emission-line; Be; stars : evolution; stars : supernovae : general; X-rays : stars;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The recent finding by Chevalier & Ilovaisky (1998) from Hipparcos observations that OB-supergiant X-ray binaries have relatively large runaway velocities (mean peculiar tangential velocity(1) [v(tr)] = 42 +/- 14 km s(-1)), whereas Be/X-ray binaries have low runaway velocities ([v(tr)] = 15 +/- 6 km s(-1)), provides confirmation of the current models for the formation of these two types of systems. These predict a difference in runaway velocity of this order of magnitude. This difference basically results from the variation of the fractional helium core mass as a function of stellar mass, in combination with the conservation of orbital angular momentum during the mass transfer phase that preceded the formation of the compact object in the system. This combination results into: (i) Systematically narrower pre-supernova orbits in the OB-supergiant systems than in the Be-systems, and (ii) A larger fractional amount of mass ejected in the supernovae in high-mass systems relative to systems of lower mass. Regardless of possible kick velocities imparted to neutron stars at birth, this combination leads to a considerable difference in average runaway velocity between these two groups. If one includes the possibility for non-conservative mass transfer the predicted difference between the runaway velocity of the two groups becomes even more pronounced. The observed low runaway velocities of the Be/X-ray binaries confirm that in most cases not more than 1 to 2 M. was ejected in the supernovae that produced their neutron stars. This, in combination with the -on average- large orbital eccentricities of these systems, indicates that their neutron stars must have received a velocity kick in the range 60-250 km s(-1) at birth. The considerable runaway velocity of Cygnus X-l (v(tr) = 50 +/- 15 km s(-1)) shows that also with the formation of a black hole considerable mass ejection takes place.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 572
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] X-RAY BINARIES AND THEIR EVOLUTION
    KLUZNIAK, W
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1991, 647 : 587 - 596
  • [32] Echoes in x-ray binaries
    O'Brien, K
    Horne, K
    Hynes, RI
    Chen, W
    Haswell, CA
    Still, MD
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 334 (02) : 426 - 434
  • [33] The youngest X-ray binaries
    Li, Xiang-Dong
    RESEARCH IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS, 2020, 20 (10)
  • [34] On the nature of Be/X-ray binaries
    Negueruela, I
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1998, 338 (02): : 505 - 510
  • [35] MASSIVE X-RAY BINARIES
    HUTCHINGS, JB
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA, 1977, 71 (05) : 406 - 406
  • [36] The youngest X-ray binaries
    Xiang-Dong Li
    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2020, 20 (10) : 68 - 75
  • [37] Are the Be/X-ray binaries synchronized?
    Stoyanov, Kiril A.
    Zamanov, Radoslav K.
    Gomboc, Andreja
    Matijevic, G.
    BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 12 : 35 - 42
  • [38] X-ray emission from supersoft X-ray binaries
    Reinsch, K
    Beuermann, K
    Gänsicke, BT
    van Teeseling, A
    Burwitz, V
    X-RAY ASTRONOMY 2000, 2001, 234 : 245 - 250
  • [39] LIMITS ON RAPID X-RAY PULSING IN X-RAY BINARIES
    SPADA, G
    BRADT, H
    DOXSEY, R
    LEVINE, A
    RAPPAPORT, S
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1974, 190 (03): : L113 - L115
  • [40] X-ray spectroscopy of candidate ultracompact X-ray binaries
    Juett, AM
    Chakrabarty, D
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 627 (02): : 926 - 932