CASE OF A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 29458/15)

被引：0

|

作者：

不详

机构：

来源：

REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO | 2021年 / 57期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页数：10

相关论文

共 50 条

[11] Aguas del Tunari SA v. The Republic of Bolivia (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/2)
Onwuamaegbu, Ucheora
ICSID REVIEW-FOREIGN INVESTMENT LAW JOURNAL, 2005, 20 (02) : 445 - 449
[12] Postova banka, a.s. and ISTROKAPITAL SE v. Hellenic Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/8 (Postova banka v. Greece)
Chevry, Jonathan
WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2016, 15 (01) : 169 - 172
[13] CASE OF ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION ROMUVA v. LITHUANIA (Application no. 48329/19)
不详
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
[14] Gloss to the Judgment of The European Court of Human Rights of February 14, 2006 on thee case of Christian Democratic People's Party v. Moldova (application no. 28793/02)
Granat, Miroslaw
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2007, (02): : 194 - 198
[15] “Matal v. Tam”Decision of the Supreme Court 29 June 2017 – Case No. 15-1293
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (6) : 749 - 751
[16] “Samsung v. Apple”Decision of the Supreme Court 6 December 2016 – Case No. 15-777
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (4) : 486 - 487
[17] “Actavis v. ICOS”Decision of the Supreme Court 27 March 2019 – Case No. [2019] UKSC 15
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 1012 - 1013
[18] The European Court of Human Rights: The Grand Chamber judgment of March 15, 2012 in the case of Sitaropoulos and Giakoumopoulos v. Greece, Application No. 42202/07
Sulkowski, Jaroslaw
PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2012, (05): : 227 - 234
[19] "Actavis v. ICOS" Decision of the Supreme Court 27 March 2019-Case No. [2019] UKSC 15
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (08) : 1012 - 1013
[20] “Impression Products v. Lexmark International”Decision of the Supreme Court 30 May 2017 – Case No. 15–1189
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (7) : 871 - 874

← 1 2 3 4 5 →