共 31 条
- [1] CASE OF AVANESYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 12999/15) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
- [2] CASE OF POLAT v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 12886/16) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
- [3] CASE OF ASLANIAN v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA (Application no. 74433/11) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
- [4] THIRD SECTION CASE OF J.C. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM (Application No. 11625/17) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
- [5] CASE OF A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (Application no. 29458/15) [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57):
- [6] Gloss to the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of March 20, 2007 in the case of Tysiac v. Poland ( application no. 5410/03) [J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2007, (03): : 200 - 211
- [7] Gloss to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights of 19 October 2004 r. in M. Melnychenko v. Ukraine, application no. 17707/02 [J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2005, (03): : 159 - 168
- [8] The European Court of Human Rights: The Grand Chamber judgment of March 15, 2012 in the case of Sitaropoulos and Giakoumopoulos v. Greece, Application No. 42202/07 [J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2012, (05): : 227 - 234
- [10] “Federal Cartel Office v. Facebook (Bundeskartellamt v. Facebook)”Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 23 June 2020 – Case No. KVR 69/19 (ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:230620BKVR69.19.0) [J]. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 : 1137 - 1165