Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method

被引:9
|
作者
Pinto, Luis [1 ]
Kaynak, Erdener [2 ]
Chow, Clement S. F. [1 ]
Zhang, Lida L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macau, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
[2] Penn State Univ Harrisburg, Middletown, PA USA
关键词
Smartphone; Chinese context; Best-Worst scaling method; Buying decision process; Product attributes; Ranking of importance; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; WINE; SEGMENTS;
D O I
10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The number of studies on the use of choice cues in the purchase decision of a smartphone does not appear to be extensive, given the size and rate of growth of the market. Surprisingly, it appears that no study of this type in the Chinese context has been undertaken. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to fill the existing gap in the marketing literature in this area. Design/methodology/approach Best-Worst (BW) scaling method was used in the study. It is suggested that the method overcomes some of the biases commonly found in surveys where Likert-type scales are used, and it has superior discriminating power, because respondents are asked to rank the most and the least important factor from a group, and are thereby forced to make tradeoffs between factors. Findings Among the 13 choice cues, connectivity, price and memory capacity are found to be the most important, whereas recommendation from others, ease of handling and availability of apps are found to be the least important. Findings due to gender, income and age difference were also analyzed and discussed for orderly decision-making purpose
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 245
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ranking model of total quality management enablers in healthcare establishments using the best-worst method
    Talib, Faisal
    Asjad, Mohammad
    Attri, Rajesh
    Siddiquee, Arshad Noor
    Khan, Zahid A.
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (05): : 790 - 814
  • [22] Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 3 (04): : 275 - 283
  • [23] Japanese Consumer Preference for Raw Fish: Best-Worst Scaling Method
    Sajiki, Takahiro
    Lu, Yu-Heng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TAIWAN, 2021, 29 (06): : 810 - 818
  • [24] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
    Hollis, Geoff
    Westbury, Chris
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2018, 50 (01) : 115 - 133
  • [25] Using Best-Worst Scaling Choice Experiments to Measure Public Perceptions and Preferences for Healthcare Reform in Australia
    Jordan J. Louviere
    Terry N. Flynn
    [J]. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2010, 3 : 275 - 283
  • [26] When is best-worst best? A comparison of best-worst scaling, numeric estimation, and rating scales for collection of semantic norms
    Geoff Hollis
    Chris Westbury
    [J]. Behavior Research Methods, 2018, 50 : 115 - 133
  • [27] A variation of the cube model for best-worst choice
    Mallahi-Karai, Keivan
    Diederich, Adele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 117
  • [28] Is Best-Worst Scaling Suitable for Health State Valuation? A Comparison with Discrete Choice Experiments
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Watson, Verity
    Ryan, Mandy
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (12) : E1 - E16
  • [29] Best-Worst Scaling Approach to Predict Customer Choice for 3PL Services
    Coltman, Tim R.
    Devinney, Timothy M.
    Keating, Byron W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2011, 32 (02) : 139 - 152
  • [30] USING BEST-WORST SCALING IN HORIZON SCANNING FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA TECHNOLOGIES
    Gallego, Gisselle
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Flynn, Terry
    Blauvelt, Barri M.
    Niessen, Louis W.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2012, 28 (03) : 339 - 346