Exploring the potential for biomethane production by willow pyrolysis using life cycle assessment methodology

被引:19
|
作者
Moghaddam, Elham Ahmadi [1 ]
Ericsson, Niclas [1 ]
Hansson, Per-Anders [1 ]
Nordberg, Ake [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Energy & Technol, POB 7032, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Maize; Willow; Pyrolysis; Life cycle assessment; Biochar; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CLIMATE IMPACT; CARBON; SOIL; SYSTEMS; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-019-0189-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundBiomethane, as a potential substitute for natural gas, reduces the use of fossil-based sources, promoting bioenergy applications. Biomethane for energy use can be produced using a variety of biomass types and technologies. Biomethane from farmland crops is currently produced by anaerobic digestion (AD) of energy crops, which is a biological treatment of organic material resulting in biomethane and digestate. Recently, thermochemical conversion technologies of biomass to biomethane have gained attention. Pyrolysis is a thermochemical process whereby woody biomass is converted to fuel gas and biochar. This study assessed the land use efficiency of producing biomethane through a maize-based AD system compared with switching to a willow-based biomethane system using pyrolysis as an emerging technology. The energy performance and climate impact of the two pathways were assessed from a land use perspective, using life cycle assessment methodology. The entire technical system, from biomass production to delivery of biomethane as the end product, was included within the analysis. The study also investigated how the climate impact was affected when biochar was applied to soil to act as a soil amendment and carbon sequestration agent or when biochar was used as an energy source.ResultsPyrolysis of willow had a higher external energy ratio and climate mitigation effect than maize-based AD as a result of lower primary energy inputs and lower methane loss in the pyrolysis process and upgrading units. Furthermore, the biochar from willow pyrolysis, when used as a soil amendment or energy source, contributed significantly to the climate impact mitigation potential in both cases. Substituting fossil gas with biomethane gave a considerable reduction in climate impact in all scenarios, especially in the case of willow pyrolysis. The willow pyrolysis system acted as a carbon sink, resulting in a negative climate impact, counteracting global warming.ConclusionFrom a land use perspective, the transition from maize-based AD to a willow-based pyrolysis system for biomethane production could be beneficial regarding the energy performance and climate impact. Application of biochar to the soil in the willow scenario contributed significantly to counteracting emissions of greenhouse gases.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle Assessment on Agricultural Production: A Mini Review on Methodology, Application, and Challenges
    Fan, Jianling
    Liu, Cuiying
    Xie, Jianan
    Han, Lu
    Zhang, Chuanhong
    Guo, Dengwei
    Niu, Junzhao
    Jin, Hao
    McConkey, Brian G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (16)
  • [42] A physics constrained methodology for the life cycle assessment of sustainable aviation fuel production
    Mannion, Liam Anthony
    Bell, Aron
    Watson-Murphy, Tiarnan
    Kelly, Mark
    Ghaani, Mohammad Reza
    Dooley, Stephen
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2024, 185
  • [43] Life-Cycle Assessment for the Production of Bioethanol from Willow Biomass Crops via Biochemical Conversion
    Budsberg, Erik
    Rastogi, Mohit
    Puettmann, Maureen E.
    Caputo, Jesse
    Balogh, Stephen
    Volk, Timothy A.
    Gustafson, Richard
    Johnson, Leonard
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2012, 62 (04) : 305 - 313
  • [44] A Simple Methodology for Estimating the Potential Biomethane Production in a Region: Application in a Case Study
    Sanchez Nocete, Eduardo
    Perez Rodriguez, Javier
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (23)
  • [45] Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment
    Hottle, Troy A.
    Bilec, Melissa M.
    Landis, Amy E.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 122 : 295 - 306
  • [46] Using Life Cycle Assessment methodology to minimize the environmental impact of dryers
    Leonard, A.
    Gerbinet, S.
    IDS'2018: 21ST INTERNATIONAL DRYING SYMPOSIUM, 2018, : 33 - 40
  • [47] Life cycle assessment of biofuels production via rice husk fast pyrolysis and upgrading
    Zhong, Zhao-Ping (zzhong@seu.edu.cn), 1844, Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences (37):
  • [48] Gasification versus fast pyrolysis bio-oil production: A life cycle assessment
    Alcazar-Ruiz, A.
    Ortiz, M. L.
    Dorado, F.
    Sanchez-Silva, L.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 336
  • [49] Opportunities and Limitations of Using Life Cycle Assessment Methodology in the ICT Sector
    Guldbrandsson, Fredrik
    Bergmark, Pernilla
    2012 ELECTRONICS GOES GREEN 2012+ (EGG), 2012,
  • [50] Exploring REACH as a potential data source for characterizing ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment
    Muller, Nienke
    de Zwart, Dick
    Hauschild, Michael
    Kijko, Gael
    Fantke, Peter
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 36 (02) : 492 - 500