Exploring the potential for biomethane production by willow pyrolysis using life cycle assessment methodology

被引:19
|
作者
Moghaddam, Elham Ahmadi [1 ]
Ericsson, Niclas [1 ]
Hansson, Per-Anders [1 ]
Nordberg, Ake [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Energy & Technol, POB 7032, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Maize; Willow; Pyrolysis; Life cycle assessment; Biochar; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CLIMATE IMPACT; CARBON; SOIL; SYSTEMS; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-019-0189-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundBiomethane, as a potential substitute for natural gas, reduces the use of fossil-based sources, promoting bioenergy applications. Biomethane for energy use can be produced using a variety of biomass types and technologies. Biomethane from farmland crops is currently produced by anaerobic digestion (AD) of energy crops, which is a biological treatment of organic material resulting in biomethane and digestate. Recently, thermochemical conversion technologies of biomass to biomethane have gained attention. Pyrolysis is a thermochemical process whereby woody biomass is converted to fuel gas and biochar. This study assessed the land use efficiency of producing biomethane through a maize-based AD system compared with switching to a willow-based biomethane system using pyrolysis as an emerging technology. The energy performance and climate impact of the two pathways were assessed from a land use perspective, using life cycle assessment methodology. The entire technical system, from biomass production to delivery of biomethane as the end product, was included within the analysis. The study also investigated how the climate impact was affected when biochar was applied to soil to act as a soil amendment and carbon sequestration agent or when biochar was used as an energy source.ResultsPyrolysis of willow had a higher external energy ratio and climate mitigation effect than maize-based AD as a result of lower primary energy inputs and lower methane loss in the pyrolysis process and upgrading units. Furthermore, the biochar from willow pyrolysis, when used as a soil amendment or energy source, contributed significantly to the climate impact mitigation potential in both cases. Substituting fossil gas with biomethane gave a considerable reduction in climate impact in all scenarios, especially in the case of willow pyrolysis. The willow pyrolysis system acted as a carbon sink, resulting in a negative climate impact, counteracting global warming.ConclusionFrom a land use perspective, the transition from maize-based AD to a willow-based pyrolysis system for biomethane production could be beneficial regarding the energy performance and climate impact. Application of biochar to the soil in the willow scenario contributed significantly to counteracting emissions of greenhouse gases.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Simulation and life cycle assessment of biofuel production via fast pyrolysis and hydroupgrading
    Peters, Jens F.
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    FUEL, 2015, 139 : 441 - 456
  • [32] Environmental assessment of the automotive cage's production process by life cycle assessment methodology
    Garbin, Marilise
    Zortea, Rafael Batista
    Moraes, Carlos Alberto Mendes
    Modolo, Regina Celia Espinosa
    Reckziegel, Viviana Nedel
    Hennemann, Daniela
    da Silva, Fernando Dalvite
    da Silva, Francielle Oliveira de Vargas
    Brehm, Feliciane Andrade
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 128 (9-10): : 4685 - 4701
  • [33] APPLICATION OF LIFE CYCLE COST METHOD FOR WILLOW PRODUCTION MACHINERY
    Tucu, Dumitru
    AKTUALNI ZADACI MEHANIZACIJE POLJOPRIVREDE, 2012, 40 : 549 - 556
  • [34] Assessment of the potential of willow SRC plants for energy production in areas contaminated by radionuclide deposits: methodology and perspectives
    Goor, F
    Davydchuk, V
    Ledent, JF
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2001, 21 (04): : 225 - 235
  • [35] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF STEAM CYCLE AND COMBINE CYCLE POWER PLANTS USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
    Annisa, Rina
    Faridah, Linda
    Yuliawan, Dwi Muchtar
    Sinisuka, Ngapuli I.
    Dinata, Indra Surya
    Leilan, Fauzi
    Revina, Tania
    Iman, D.
    Samuel, Darma
    2018 4TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON POWER ENGINEERING AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (ICPERE 2018), 2018, : 145 - 150
  • [36] Assessment of the key factors affecting GHG emissions in the life cycle of biomethane
    Berdechowski, Kamil
    NAFTA-GAZ, 2020, (09): : 630 - 636
  • [37] Life cycle assessment of biomethane from offshore-cultivated seaweed
    Langlois, Juliette
    Sassi, Jean-Francois
    Jard, Gwenaelle
    Steyer, Jean-Philippe
    Delgenes, Jean-Philippe
    Helias, Arnaud
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (04): : 387 - 404
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis oil applications
    Peters, Jens F.
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2015, 5 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [39] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF WASTE TIRE PYROLYSIS
    Banar, Mufide
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2015, 24 (04): : 1215 - 1226
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of pyrolysis oil applications
    Jens F. Peters
    Diego Iribarren
    Javier Dufour
    Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2015, 5 : 1 - 19