Exploring the potential for biomethane production by willow pyrolysis using life cycle assessment methodology

被引:19
|
作者
Moghaddam, Elham Ahmadi [1 ]
Ericsson, Niclas [1 ]
Hansson, Per-Anders [1 ]
Nordberg, Ake [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci SLU, Dept Energy & Technol, POB 7032, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Maize; Willow; Pyrolysis; Life cycle assessment; Biochar; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CLIMATE IMPACT; CARBON; SOIL; SYSTEMS; MAIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13705-019-0189-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
BackgroundBiomethane, as a potential substitute for natural gas, reduces the use of fossil-based sources, promoting bioenergy applications. Biomethane for energy use can be produced using a variety of biomass types and technologies. Biomethane from farmland crops is currently produced by anaerobic digestion (AD) of energy crops, which is a biological treatment of organic material resulting in biomethane and digestate. Recently, thermochemical conversion technologies of biomass to biomethane have gained attention. Pyrolysis is a thermochemical process whereby woody biomass is converted to fuel gas and biochar. This study assessed the land use efficiency of producing biomethane through a maize-based AD system compared with switching to a willow-based biomethane system using pyrolysis as an emerging technology. The energy performance and climate impact of the two pathways were assessed from a land use perspective, using life cycle assessment methodology. The entire technical system, from biomass production to delivery of biomethane as the end product, was included within the analysis. The study also investigated how the climate impact was affected when biochar was applied to soil to act as a soil amendment and carbon sequestration agent or when biochar was used as an energy source.ResultsPyrolysis of willow had a higher external energy ratio and climate mitigation effect than maize-based AD as a result of lower primary energy inputs and lower methane loss in the pyrolysis process and upgrading units. Furthermore, the biochar from willow pyrolysis, when used as a soil amendment or energy source, contributed significantly to the climate impact mitigation potential in both cases. Substituting fossil gas with biomethane gave a considerable reduction in climate impact in all scenarios, especially in the case of willow pyrolysis. The willow pyrolysis system acted as a carbon sink, resulting in a negative climate impact, counteracting global warming.ConclusionFrom a land use perspective, the transition from maize-based AD to a willow-based pyrolysis system for biomethane production could be beneficial regarding the energy performance and climate impact. Application of biochar to the soil in the willow scenario contributed significantly to counteracting emissions of greenhouse gases.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the potential for biomethane production by willow pyrolysis using life cycle assessment methodology
    Elham Ahmadi Moghaddam
    Niclas Ericsson
    Per-Anders Hansson
    Åke Nordberg
    Energy, Sustainability and Society, 9
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of biohydrogen and biomethane production and utilisation as a vehicle fuel
    Patterson, Tim
    Esteves, Sandra
    Dinsdale, Richard
    Guwy, Alan
    Maddy, Jon
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 131 : 235 - 245
  • [3] Assessment of biomethane potential of cotton stalk using response surface methodology
    Yildirim, Oznur
    Altinbas, Mahmut
    Ozkaya, Bestami
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2023, 31 (01) : 14 - 29
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of Cellulosic Ethanol and Biomethane Production from Forest Residues
    Liang, Shaobo
    Gu, Hongmei
    Bergman, Richard D.
    BIORESOURCES, 2017, 12 (04): : 7873 - 7883
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment of Biomethane vs. Fossil Methane Production and Supply
    Amato, Alessia
    Tsigkou, Konstantina
    Becci, Alessandro
    Beolchini, Francesca
    Ippolito, Nicolo M.
    Ferella, Francesco
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (12)
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina
    Morero, Betzabet
    Groppelli, Eduardo
    Campanella, Enrique A.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 182 : 208 - 216
  • [7] Using Life Cycle Assessment methodology to assess UHT milk production in Portugal
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara
    Castanheira, Erica G.
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Arroja, Luis
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 442 : 225 - 234
  • [8] Environmental impacts of peanut production system using life cycle assessment methodology
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Khojastehpour, Mehdi
    Emadi, Bagher
    Taheri-Rad, Alireza
    Khorramdel, Surur
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 92 : 84 - 90
  • [9] The environmental impact assessment of wheat and barley production by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology
    F. Fallahpour
    A. Aminghafouri
    A. Ghalegolab Behbahani
    M. Bannayan
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2012, 14 (6) : 979 - 992
  • [10] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF BIOMETHANE PRODUCTION VIA A NATIONWIDE SYSTEMS OF GASIFICATION AND METHANATION FOR IRELAND
    Singlitico, Alessandro
    Goggins, Jamie
    Monaghan, Rory F. D.
    PAPERS OF THE 24TH EUROPEAN BIOMASS CONFERENCE: SETTING THE COURSE FOR A BIOBASED ECONOMY, 2016, : 1502 - 1509