Cross-country spillovers of renewable energy promotion-The case of Germany

被引:6
|
作者
Abrell, Jan [1 ]
Kosch, Mirjam [2 ]
机构
[1] ZEW Leibniz Ctr European Econ Res, Mannheim, Germany
[2] PIK Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Renewable promotion; Electricity prices; Merit-order effect; Cross-border impacts; Carbon emissions; WIND; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101293
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electricity generation based on renewable energy (RE) sources such as wind and solar replace the most expensive generators that often rely on fossil fuels. In response to RE promotion, wholesale electricity prices and carbon emissions are therefore expected to decrease. In interconnected electricity systems, this so-called merit-order effect stimulates a change in electricity trade flows. Therefore, conventional generation and prices in neighboring countries are also likely to decrease. The impact of these trade reactions on carbon offsets is ambiguous and depends on installed generation and interconnector capacities. Moreover, the cross-border merit-order effect causes opposing effects on consumers and producers: generators' profits decline, while consumers benefit from lower electricity costs and an increase in the consumer surplus. Using a rich data set of hourly technology-specific generation and wholesale market price data for ten central European countries, we estimate the domestic and cross-border impacts of German RE for the years 2015-2020. We find that German RE generation offset 79-113 MtCO(2) per year. The major emission effect took place in Germany (64-99 MtCO(2)). The average cost of emission offset of 212-321(sic)/t were almost entirely borne by German market participants. Neighboring countries do not bear costs, but a significant shift from producer to consumer rents is observed. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Distribution dynamics of energy intensities: A cross-country analysis
    Ezcurra, Roberto
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (10) : 5254 - 5259
  • [42] A cross-country analysis of aggregate energy and carbon intensities
    Ang, B. W.
    Liu, N.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (15) : 2398 - 2404
  • [43] A cross-country analysis of sustainability, transport and energy poverty
    Dylan D. Furszyfer Del Rio
    Benjamin K. Sovacool
    Steve Griffiths
    Aoife M. Foley
    Jonathan Furszyfer Del Rio
    [J]. npj Urban Sustainability, 3
  • [44] A Fuzzy PROMETHEE Method for Evaluating Strategies towards a Cross-Country Renewable Energy Cooperation: The Cases of Egypt and Morocco
    Papapostolou, Aikaterini
    Karakosta, Charikleia
    Mexis, Filippos-Dimitrios
    Andreoulaki, Ioanna
    Psarras, John
    [J]. Energies, 2024, 17 (19)
  • [45] Cross-country comparison in dishonest behaviour: Germany and East Asian countries
    Huynh, Toan L. D.
    Rieger, Marc Oliver
    Wang, Mei
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 215
  • [46] City policies to promote entrepreneurship: A cross-country comparison of Poland and Germany
    Fazlagic, Jan
    Sulczewska-Remi, Aleksandra
    Loopesko, Windham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP MANAGEMENT AND INNOVATION, 2021, 17 (02) : 159 - 185
  • [47] ISDN IMPLEMENTATION IN THE UNITED-STATES AND GERMANY - A CROSS-COUNTRY ASSESSMENT
    LAI, VS
    REEH, B
    [J]. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (03) : 131 - 140
  • [48] Accounting for Cross-Country Differences in Employee Involvement Practices: Comparative Case Studies in Germany, Brazil and China
    Krzywdzinski, Martin
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2017, 55 (02) : 321 - 346
  • [49] A review of health promotion funding for older adults in Europe: a cross-country comparison
    Arsenijevic, Jelena
    Groot, Wim
    Tambor, Marzena
    Golinowska, Stanislawa
    Sowada, Christoph
    Pavlova, Milena
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16
  • [50] Renewable electricity consumption in the EU-27: Are cross-country differences diminishing?
    Maza, Adolfo
    Hierro, Maria
    Villaverde, Jose
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (09) : 2094 - 2101