Cross-country spillovers of renewable energy promotion-The case of Germany

被引:6
|
作者
Abrell, Jan [1 ]
Kosch, Mirjam [2 ]
机构
[1] ZEW Leibniz Ctr European Econ Res, Mannheim, Germany
[2] PIK Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Renewable promotion; Electricity prices; Merit-order effect; Cross-border impacts; Carbon emissions; WIND; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101293
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Electricity generation based on renewable energy (RE) sources such as wind and solar replace the most expensive generators that often rely on fossil fuels. In response to RE promotion, wholesale electricity prices and carbon emissions are therefore expected to decrease. In interconnected electricity systems, this so-called merit-order effect stimulates a change in electricity trade flows. Therefore, conventional generation and prices in neighboring countries are also likely to decrease. The impact of these trade reactions on carbon offsets is ambiguous and depends on installed generation and interconnector capacities. Moreover, the cross-border merit-order effect causes opposing effects on consumers and producers: generators' profits decline, while consumers benefit from lower electricity costs and an increase in the consumer surplus. Using a rich data set of hourly technology-specific generation and wholesale market price data for ten central European countries, we estimate the domestic and cross-border impacts of German RE for the years 2015-2020. We find that German RE generation offset 79-113 MtCO(2) per year. The major emission effect took place in Germany (64-99 MtCO(2)). The average cost of emission offset of 212-321(sic)/t were almost entirely borne by German market participants. Neighboring countries do not bear costs, but a significant shift from producer to consumer rents is observed. (C) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cross-country technology diffusion:: The case of computers
    不详
    [J]. RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 44 (06) : 62 - 62
  • [32] Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers
    Caselli, F
    Coleman, WJ
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02): : 328 - 335
  • [33] Cross-category and cross-country spillovers of economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from the US and China
    Liu, Tangyong
    Gong, Xu
    Ge, Houyi
    Wang, Jie
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2023, 68
  • [34] International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations
    Mancusi, Maria Luisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 76 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [35] R&D, human capital and international technology spillovers: A cross-country analysis
    Frantzen, D
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 102 (01): : 57 - 75
  • [36] A cross-country analysis of sustainability, transport and energy poverty
    Del Rio, Dylan Furszyfer D.
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Griffiths, Steve
    Foley, Aoife M.
    Del Rio, Jonathan Furszyfer
    [J]. NPJ URBAN SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [37] China's energy inefficiency: A cross-country comparison
    Wei, Chu
    Ni, Jinlan
    Sheng, Manhong
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (03): : 478 - 488
  • [38] Energy content in manufacturing exports: A cross-country analysis
    Amador, Joao
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (04) : 1074 - 1081
  • [39] IEA issues 'cross-country overview' of energy policies
    Leblond, D
    [J]. OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2004, 102 (46) : 28 - +
  • [40] A cross-country comparison of the building energy consumptions and their trends
    Berardi, Umberto
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2017, 123 : 230 - 241