Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Is Linezolid or Daptomycin Favored Over Vancomycin?

被引:3
|
作者
Vu, Michelle [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Smith, Kenneth J. [3 ]
Aspinall, Sherrie L. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Clancy, Cornelius J. [3 ,5 ]
Buehrle, Deanna J. [5 ]
机构
[1] VA Ctr Hlth Equ Res & Promot, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] VA Ctr Medicat Safety, Hines, IL USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Syst, Pittsburgh, PA 15240 USA
[6] Optum Life Sci HOER, Eden Prairie, MN USA
关键词
MRSA BACTEREMIA; GREATER-THAN-1; MG/L; THERAPY; HEALTH; NEUTROPENIA; TROUGHS; LACTAM;
D O I
10.1007/s40261-021-01077-8
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Objective Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality, and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. Our objective was to compare the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens against MRSAB. Methods We estimated the cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/ daptomycin) for Veterans Health Administration patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure at 7 days and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation after at least 7 days. Results In base-case analyses, intravenous linezolid was the least expensive regimen at 4 and 6 weeks. Daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than linezolid, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of similar to$13,000 (4 weeks) per composite failure avoided. With 6 weeks of treatment, daptomycin was more expensive and more effective than vancomycin (ICER similar to$21,000 per composite failure avoided). Vancomycin and ceftaroline/daptomycin were dominated strategies at both 4 and 6 weeks. In one-way sensitivity analyses, vancomycin was favored when its microbiological failure risk was less than 20.1% (base-case: 27.2%), assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/composite treatment failure avoided. In two-way sensitivity analyses, intravenous linezolid was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were < 22.5% and < 17.3%, respectively. Daptomycin, vancomycin, and linezolid were favored in 50%, 31%, and 17% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP. Conclusion Daptomycin is likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed on the safety of linezolid against MRSAB.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 894
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
    Alosaimy, Sara
    Sabagha, Noor L.
    Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
    Zasowski, Evan J.
    Morrisette, Taylor
    Jorgensen, Sarah C. J.
    Trinh, Trang D.
    Mynatt, Ryan P.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY, 2020, 9 (02) : 325 - 339
  • [22] Monotherapy with Vancomycin or Daptomycin versus Combination Therapy with β-Lactams in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
    Sara Alosaimy
    Noor L. Sabagha
    Abdalhamid M. Lagnf
    Evan J. Zasowski
    Taylor Morrisette
    Sarah C. J. Jorgensen
    Trang D. Trinh
    Ryan P. Mynatt
    Michael J. Rybak
    Infectious Diseases and Therapy, 2020, 9 : 325 - 339
  • [23] Linezolid for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children
    Kaplan, SL
    Afghani, B
    Lopez, P
    Wu, EB
    Fleishaker, D
    Edge-Padbury, B
    Naberhuis-Stehouwer, S
    Bruss, JB
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2003, 22 (09) : S176 - S183
  • [24] Vancomycin versus Linezolid in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Meningitis
    Sipahi, Oguz Resat
    Bardak-Ozcem, Selin
    Turhan, Tuncer
    Arda, Bilgin
    Ruksen, Mete
    Pullukcu, Husnu
    Aydemir, Sohret
    Dalbasti, Tayfun
    Yurtseven, Taskin
    Sipahi, Hilal
    Zileli, Mehmet
    Ulusoy, Sercan
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2013, 14 (04) : 357 - 362
  • [25] Cost-effectiveness of linezolid vs. vancomycin in nosocomial pneumonia due to suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in France
    De Cock, E.
    Timsit, J. F.
    Carlet, J.
    Leroy, O.
    Wolff, M.
    Levrat, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (06) : A439 - A439
  • [26] Vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin, and linezolid MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is associated with clonality
    Hsieh, Yu-Chia
    Lin, Yu-Chun
    Huang, Yhu-Chering
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (41)
  • [27] Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections
    Claeys, Kimberly C.
    Zasowski, Evan J.
    Casapao, Anthony M.
    Lagnf, Abdalhamid M.
    Nagel, Jerod L.
    Nguyen, Cynthia T.
    Hallesy, Jessica A.
    Compton, Mathew T.
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Levine, Donald P.
    Davis, Susan L.
    Rybak, Michael J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2016, 60 (10) : 5841 - 5848
  • [28] Retrospective Analysis of Clinical and Cost Outcomes Associated with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Treated with Daptomycin, Vancomycin, or Linezolid
    Wright, Bradley M.
    Eiland, Edward H., III
    JOURNAL OF PATHOGENS, 2011, 2011
  • [29] Alternatives to vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Micek, Scott T.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 : S184 - S190
  • [30] Ceftobiprole Is Superior to Vancomycin, Daptomycin, and Linezolid for Treatment of Experimental Endocarditis in Rabbits Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Tattevin, P.
    Basuino, L.
    Bauer, D.
    Diep, B. A.
    Chambers, H. F.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2010, 54 (02) : 610 - 613