Linezolid for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children

被引:0
|
作者
Kaplan, SL
Afghani, B
Lopez, P
Wu, EB
Fleishaker, D
Edge-Padbury, B
Naberhuis-Stehouwer, S
Bruss, JB
机构
[1] Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Miller Childrens Hosp, Long Beach, CA USA
[4] Hosp Univ Valle, Cali, Colombia
[5] Hosp San Juan Dios, Santiago, Chile
[6] Pharmacia Corp, Kalamazoo, MI USA
关键词
linezolid; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; infection; pediatric;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are becoming increasingly prevalent. Linezolid is effective and well-tolerated in the treatment of adults with AMSA infections. Objective. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of iv/oral linezolid in children with MRSA infections. Methods. Data were obtained from two independent clinical trials. In an outpatient trial children (5 to 17 years of age) with uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) were treated with linezolid or cefadroxil. In an inpatient trial hospitalized children (0 to 11 years of age) with pneumonia, bacteremia or complicated SSSI caused by resistant Gram-positive pathogens were administered iv linezolid with the option to switch to oral suspension (patients >90 days of age) or iv vancomycin. A subset of patients with MRSA infections from the two clinical trials is analyzed herein. Results. In the outpatient trial children with skin infections caused by MRSA were treated with linezolid (15 patients) and cefadroxil (10 patients). In the microbiologically evaluable population, the clinical cure rate was 92.3% in the linezolid group and 85.7% in the cefadroxil group (P = 0.64). The pathogen eradication rate for AMSA was 92.3 and 85.7% in the linezolid and cefadroxil groups, respectively (P = 0.64). There were very few adverse events or drug-related adverse events and no serious adverse events in the outpatient trial. In the inpatient trial 20 children treated with linezolid and 14 treated with vancomycin had infections caused by MRSA. In the microbiologically evaluable population, the clinical cure rate was 94.1% in the linezolid group and 90.0% in the vancomycin group (P = 0.69). Pathogen eradication rates were 88.2 and 90.0% for the linezolid and vancomycin groups, respectively (P = 0.89). Susceptibility patterns of the AMSA isolates showed distinct patterns between the outpatient and inpatient trials. In the inpatient trial fewer patients in the linezolid group had drug-related adverse events than did those in the vancomycin group (20% vs. 43%; P = 0.15). Conclusions. Intravenous/oral linezolid is effective and well-tolerated in children with MRSA infections.
引用
收藏
页码:S176 / S183
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linezolid vs vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children
    Bruss, JB
    Edge-Padbury, B
    Naberhuis-Stehouwer, S
    Kaplan, SL
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2003, 53 (04) : 322A - 322A
  • [2] Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Stevens, DL
    Herr, D
    Lampiris, H
    Hunt, JL
    Batts, DH
    Hafkin, B
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (11) : 1481 - 1490
  • [3] Linezolid versus vancomycin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections
    Johnson, JR
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2003, 36 (02) : 236 - 237
  • [4] Clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children
    Frank, AL
    Marcinak, JF
    Mangat, PD
    Tjhio, JT
    Kelkar, S
    Schreckenberger, PC
    Quinn, JP
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2002, 21 (06) : 530 - 534
  • [5] Linezolid treatment of prosthetic hip infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Bassetti, M
    Di Biagio, A
    Cenderello, G
    Del Bono, V
    Palermo, A
    Cruciani, M
    Bassetti, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2001, 43 (02) : 148 - 149
  • [6] Treatment of meningitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with linezolid
    Kessler, A. T.
    Kourtis, A. P.
    [J]. INFECTION, 2007, 35 (04) : 271 - 274
  • [7] Treatment failure of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis with linezolid
    Corne, P
    Marchandin, H
    Macia, JC
    Jonquet, O
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 37 (11-12) : 946 - 949
  • [8] Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Japan
    Kohno, S.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Aikawa, N.
    Sumiyama, Y.
    Odagiri, S.
    Aoki, N.
    Niki, Y.
    Watanabe, S.
    Furue, M.
    Ito, T.
    Croos-Dabrera, R.
    Tack, K. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2007, 60 (06) : 1361 - 1369
  • [9] Linezolid treatment of prosthetic hip infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Matteo Bassetti
    Antonio Di Biagio
    Giovanni Cenderello
    Valerio Del Bono
    Augusto Palermo
    Luigi Molfetta
    Francesco Pipino
    Dante Bassetti
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2000, 1 (3) : 147 - 150
  • [10] Linezolid treatment of skeletal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection
    Isenberg J.
    Prokop A.
    Seifert H.
    Jubel A.
    [J]. European Journal of Trauma, 2004, 30 (6): : 387 - 393