Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Growth, and Energy Policy in China

被引:7
|
作者
Hong, Lucheng [1 ]
Chao, Angela [2 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Elect Engn, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Management & Econ, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
strategic corporate social responsibility; environmental regulation; energy policy; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/en11113024
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
China's economy steps into the new normal phase, as it is growing in an innovation-driven instead of a factor-driven mode. In this paper, we constructed the corporate behavioral decision models in different scenarios of policy and analyzed the effect of energy policies on corporate behavior and societal welfare, in a duopoly market. The following conclusions were derived. (1) In a duopoly, the product pricing is irrelevant to the resource cost in their production process. (2) For the firm undertaking the social responsibility, the energy tax imposed by the government would increase either the production or the profit, but decrease the consumer surplus. In contrast, for the other firms, the energy tax rate is opposite to their profit. (3) Low-energy-consuming products will promote efficiency, which reduces either the price or the marginal cost, resulting in a more conspicuous cost advantage to the firm adopting the ecological innovation. (4) The marginal cost for a low-energy-consuming technology research and development steadily decreases, which turns their short-term financial disadvantages into the long-term competitive advantages. The marginal contribution of this paper was to build a simultaneously moving model, in duopoly market, and provide theoretical evidence to endogenize the firm strategy to undertake social responsibilities and to realize sustainable growth.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate social responsibility for implementation of sustainable energy development in Baltic States
    Streimikiene, Dalla
    Simanaviciene, Zaneta
    Kovaliov, Ruslan
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (04): : 813 - 824
  • [32] Dynamic Capability and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility Adoption: Evidence from China
    Li, Jing Claire
    Benamraoui, Abdelhafid
    Shah, Neeta
    Mathew, Sudha
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [33] Corporate social responsibility, strategic style and enterprise innovation: evidence from China
    Shi, Henggui
    Yan, Guowan
    Cai, Qiqi
    Tian, Meng
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022,
  • [34] Strategic corporate social responsibility by a multinational firm
    Manasakis, Constantine
    Mitrokostas, Evangelos
    Petrakis, Emmanuel
    [J]. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 26 (03) : 709 - 720
  • [35] Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability
    Orlitzky, Marc
    Siegel, Donald S.
    Waldman, David A.
    [J]. BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2011, 50 (01) : 6 - 27
  • [36] Strategic corporate social responsibility and economic performance
    Belu, Constantin
    Manescu, Cristiana
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (19) : 2751 - 2764
  • [37] Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility
    Heslin, Peter A.
    Ochoa, Jenna D.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2008, 37 (02) : 125 - 144
  • [38] Stakeholder preference and strategic corporate social responsibility
    Banerjee, Shantanu
    Homroy, Swarnodeep
    Slechten, Aurelie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2022, 77
  • [39] THE CASE FOR A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Candea, D.
    Candea, R. M.
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES, VOL 2, 2009, : 425 - 428
  • [40] Competitiveness as a Strategic Outcome of Corporate Social Responsibility
    Marin, Longinos
    Rubio, Alicia
    Ruiz de Maya, Salvador
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 19 (06) : 364 - 376