Characterization of amorphous silicon flat panel imager for dose measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Szabo, J.
Khan, R.
Ostapiak, O.
机构
[1] Juravinski Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Tom Baker Canc Clin, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Hamilton Reg Canc Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2760751
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The major objective of the work was to categorize the dosimetric response of a Varian aS500 type Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID) for dose measurements. Method and Materials: For a 6MV beam from a Varian 21EX linear accelerator, reproducibility of EPID pixel response, dose rate effect, and cumulative dose linearity were studied. In addition, scatter characteristics and depth doses were also determined using the EPID. A Capintec ion chamber in a polystyrene miniphantom and a Wellhöfer water phantom were used for comparative measurements. Results: The EPID response was found to be independent of dose rates from 100 MU/min to 600 MU/min at larger source to detector distances. However, pixel saturation was observed for dose rates beyond 300 MU/min with the EPID placed at the isocentre. Raw pixel response was reproducible to within 2 % when measured over a period of 6 weeks. Changes in scatter conditions with field size were also measured for the EPID. The EPID scatter was found to be in between 5 to 10 cm of a full water phantom. The gray scale response is linear with the dose to the portal imager. The validity of inverse square relationship was also tested to be within 0.5%, for the EPID at various distances from the source. Conclusions: The depth dose data measured with EPID showed good correspondence with that measured with a thimble type ionization chamber in a water phantom. Compared to ionization chamber data, open beam profiles measured with EPID show flat response in high dose region, rapid fall‐off in high dose gradients (> 30%/cm), and higher penumbra tail. The agreement with the ion chamber measurements could be improved if the flood field correction is performed to restore off‐axis variation of beam profile. In general the EPID qualifies as a useful tool for planar dose measurements. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2423 / 2423
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low Dose Imaging with Avalanche Amorphous Selenium Flat Panel Imager
    Scheuermann, J.
    Howansky, A.
    Goldan, A.
    Leveille, S.
    Tousignant, O.
    Tanioka, K.
    Zhao, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3692 - 3692
  • [2] Dosimetry of X-ray fields with an amorphous silicon flat panel imager
    Wendling, M
    McDermott, LN
    Sonke, JJ
    Louwe, RJW
    Van Herk, MB
    Mijnheer, BJ
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S26 - S27
  • [3] Megavoltage imaging with a large-area, flat-panel, amorphous silicon imager
    Antonuk, LE
    Yorkston, J
    Huang, WD
    Sandler, H
    Siewerdsen, JH
    ElMohri, Y
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 36 (03): : 661 - 672
  • [4] Geometrical verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiotherapy using an amorphous silicon flat panel imager
    Sonke, JJ
    Ploeger, LS
    Brand, B
    Smitsmans, MHP
    van Herk, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1352 - 1352
  • [5] Calibration of an amorphous-silicon flat panel portal imager for exit-beam dosimetry
    Chen, J
    Chuang, CF
    Morin, O
    Aubin, M
    Pouliot, J
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (03) : 584 - 594
  • [6] ON RADIOTHERAPY DOSE VERIFICATION WITH A FLAT-PANEL IMAGER
    McDermott, L.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 92 : S49 - S49
  • [7] Characterization of an amorphous silicon fluoroscopic imager
    Colbeth, RE
    Allen, MJ
    Day, DJ
    Gilblom, DL
    KlausmeierBrown, ME
    Pavkovich, J
    Seppi, EJ
    Shapiro, EG
    [J]. PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING - MEDICAL IMAGING 1997, 1997, 3032 : 42 - 51
  • [8] Dosimetric verification of IMRT fields using an amorphous silicon flat panel imager and Monte Carlo simulation
    Kim, J
    Siebers, J
    Keall, P
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1197 - 1197
  • [9] Potential and limitations of the automatic detection of fiducial markers using an amorphous silicon flat-panel imager
    Buck, D
    Alber, M
    Nüsslin, F
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (06): : 763 - 774
  • [10] Amorphous silicon TFTs and flat panel displays
    Tsukada, T
    [J]. FLAT PANEL DISPLAY MATERIALS II, 1997, 424 : 3 - 8