Commissioning and quality assurance for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system

被引:3
|
作者
Iftimia, Ileana [1 ,2 ]
Talmadge, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Ladd, Ron [1 ]
Halvorsen, Per [1 ]
机构
[1] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Burlington, MA USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
来源
关键词
AccuBoost system; treatment delivery components; commissioning methodology; quality assurance tests; GUIDED BREAST BRACHYTHERAPY; DOSIMETRY; FEASIBILITY; APPLICATORS; PHOTON; BOOST; AAPM;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5156
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objective for this work was to develop a commissioning methodology for the treatment delivery components of the AccuBoost system, as well as to establish a routine quality assurance program and appropriate guidance for clinical use based on the commissioning results. Various tests were developed: 1) assessment of the accuracy of the displayed separation value; 2) validation of the dwell positions within each applicator; 3) assessment of the accuracy and precision of the applicator localization system; 4) assessment of the combined dose profile of two opposed applicators to confirm that they are coaxial; 5) measurement of the absolute dose delivered with each applicator to confirm acceptable agreement with dose based on Monte Carlo modeling; 6) measurements of the skin-to-center dose ratio using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters; and 7) assessment of the mammopad cushion's effect on the center dose. We found that the difference between the measured and the actual paddle separation is < 0.1 cm for the separation range of 3 cm to 7.5 cm. Radiochromic film measurements demonstrated that the number of dwell positions inside the applicators agree with the values from the vendor, for each applicator type and size. The shift needed for a good applicator-grid alignment was within 0.2 cm. The dry-run test using film demonstrated that the shift of the dosimetric center is within 0.15 cm. Dose measurements in water converted to polystyrene agreed within 5.0% with the Monte Carlo data in polystyrene for the same applicator type, size, and depth. A solid water-to-water ( phantom) factor was obtained for each applicator, and all future annual quality assurance tests will be performed in solid water using an average value of 1.07 for the solid water-to-water factor. The skin-to-center dose ratio measurements support the Monte Carlo-based values within 5.0% agreement. For the treatment separation range of 4 cm to 8cm, the change in center dose would be < 1.0% for all applicators when using a compressed pad of 0.2 cm to 0.3 cm. The tests performed ensured that all treatment components of the AccuBoost system are functional and that a treatment plan can be delivered with acceptable accuracy. Based on the commissioning results, a quality assurance manual and guidance documents for clinical use were developed.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 143
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system
    Ling, C. Clifton
    Zhang, Pengpeng
    Archambault, Yves
    Bocanek, Jim
    Tang, Grace
    LoSasso, Thomas
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (02): : 575 - 581
  • [2] COMMISSIONING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TREATMENT PLANNING COMPUTERS
    VANDYK, J
    BARNETT, RB
    CYGLER, JE
    SHRAGGE, PC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (02): : 261 - 273
  • [3] Simple Commissioning and Quality Assurance of a Gating System
    Morin, O.
    Hsu, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)
  • [4] COMMISSIONING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TREATMENT PLANNING COMPUTERS - COMMENTS
    MCSHAN, DL
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 26 (02): : 371 - 372
  • [5] Commissioning and routine quality assurance of the Radixact Synchrony system
    Goddard, Lee
    Jeong, Kyoungkeun
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (02) : 1181 - 1195
  • [6] Quality Assurance and QMP for Brachytherapy Treatment Delivery and Treatment Planning System
    Chilukuri, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3776 - 3776
  • [7] Commissioning and quality assurance of a commercial stereotactic treatment-planning system for extracranial IMRT
    Wang, Lu
    Li, Jinsheng
    Paskalev, Kamen
    Hoban, Peter
    Luo, Wei
    Chen, Lili
    McNeeley, Shawn
    Price, Robert
    Ma, Charlie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 7 (01): : 21 - 34
  • [8] Report On Use of a Methodology for Commissioning and Quality Assurance of a VMAT System
    Mayo, C.
    de los Santos, L. Fong
    Kruse, J.
    Blackwell, C.
    McLemore, L.
    Pafundi, D.
    Stoker, J.
    Herman, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3790 - 3791
  • [9] Report on Use of a Methodology for Commissioning and Quality Assurance of a VMAT System
    Mayo, Charles
    de los Santos, Luis Fong
    Kruse, Jon
    Blackwell, Charles R.
    McLemore, Luke B.
    Pafundi, Deanna
    Stoker, Joshua
    Herman, Michael
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [10] Film-based delivery quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery: Commissioning and validation
    Blanck, Oliver
    Masi, Laura
    Damme, Marie-Christin
    Hildebrandt, Guido
    Dunst, Juergen
    Siebert, Frank-Andre
    Poppinga, Daniela
    Poppe, Bjoern
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 31 (05): : 476 - 483