NON-INVASIVE DETECTION OF DIFFUSE INTRACRANIAL VERTEBROBASILAR ARTERY STENOSIS: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON WITH DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Jie [1 ]
Wang, Lijuan [1 ]
Chen, Ying [1 ]
Wang, Sibo [1 ]
Cui, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Neurol, Neurosci Ctr, Changchun, Peoples R China
来源
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2022年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
Intracranial atherosclerosis; Vertebrobasilar artery stenosis; Diffuse stenosis; transcranial Doppler; Duplex ultrasonography; MIDDLE CEREBRAL-ARTERY; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; COLOR-CODED SONOGRAPHY; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; VERTEBRAL ARTERY; FOLLOW-UP; STROKE; MULTICENTER; PREVALENCE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.11.015
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate diffuse intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis by ultrasonic examination with digital subtraction angiography as the reference. Five hundred forty-one vertebrobasilar arteries with a normal lumen or intracranial stenosis were enrolled. Peak systolic velocity, mean flow velocity and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) at the intracranial vertebrobasilar arteries and extracranial vertebral arteries (VAs) were measured. The resistance index (RI) at extracranial VAs and the difference between the RI of extracranial VAs and the RI of the extracranial internal carotid artery (Mica) were calculated. Compared with normal arteries, all stenotic arteries were divided into the high-velocity group (focal stenosis, multiple-segment stenosis and multiple-artery stenosis) and low-velocity group (critical stenosis and long stenosis). The consistency between ultrasonic examination and digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of vertebrobasilar arteries with multiple-segment stenosis and multiple-artery stenosis was not favorable when applying the widely used Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis criteria (kappa = 0.442 and 0.438, respectively). The optimal low-velocity criteria for identifying intracranial vertebrobasilar arteries with critical stenosis and long stenosis were determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and were as follows: EDV <15 cm/s and RI >0.68 at the extracranial VA and Rlica >= 0.10. (C) 2021 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 564
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, AND DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY IN ASSESSMENT OF EXTRACRANIAL INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS
    Tian, Yan
    Ye, Zhidong
    Wu, Jingping
    Ma, Jiaojiao
    Zheng, Chenglong
    Fan, Xueqiang
    Liu, Jian
    Chen, Jie
    Zheng, Xia
    Guo, Dandan
    Yang, Lin
    Huang, Yan
    Song, Xueni
    Zhang, Haiyang
    Liu, Peng
    Zheng, Min
    ACTA MEDICA MEDITERRANEA, 2016, 32 (02): : 427 - 430
  • [22] Renal artery stenosis: Detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography versus optimized digital subtraction angiography
    Kaatee, R
    Beek, FJA
    deLange, EE
    vanLeeuwen, MS
    Smits, HFM
    vanderVen, PJG
    Beutler, JJ
    Mali, WPTM
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (01) : 121 - 127
  • [23] Comparison of NASCET and WASID criteria for the measurement of intracranial stenosis using digital subtraction and computed tomography angiography of the middle cerebral artery
    Huang, Jun
    Degnan, Andrew J.
    Liu, Qi
    Teng, Zhongzhao
    Yue, Chen Shi
    Gillard, Jonathan H.
    Lu, Jian Ping
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 39 (05) : 342 - 345
  • [24] Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography
    David Netuka
    Tomáš Belšán
    Karolina Broulíková
    Václav Mandys
    František Charvát
    Josef Malík
    Lucie Coufalová
    Ondřej Bradáč
    Svatopluk Ostrý
    Vladimír Beneš
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2016, 158 : 1505 - 1514
  • [25] Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography
    Netuka, David
    Belsan, Tomas
    Broulikova, Karolina
    Mandys, Vaclav
    Charvat, Frantisek
    Malik, Josef
    Coufalova, Lucie
    Bradac, Ondrej
    Ostry, Svatopluk
    Benes, Vladimir
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2016, 158 (08) : 1505 - 1514
  • [26] Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens
    Netuka, David
    Ostry, Svatopluk
    Belsan, Tomas
    Rucka, David
    Mandys, Vaclav
    Charvat, Frantisek
    Bradac, Ondrej
    Benes, Vladimir
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2010, 152 (07) : 1215 - 1221
  • [27] Magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in detection of carotid artery stenosis: a comparison with findings from histological specimens
    David Netuka
    Svatopluk Ostrý
    Tomáš Belšán
    David Ručka
    Václav Mandys
    František Charvát
    Ondřej Bradáč
    Vladimír Beneš
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2010, 152 : 1215 - 1221
  • [28] Comparison of intraarterial MR angiography at 3.0 T with X-ray digital subtraction angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis in swine
    Rhee, Thomas K.
    Park, Jonathan K.
    Cashen, Ty A.
    Shin, Wanyong
    Schirf, Brian E.
    Gehl, James A.
    Larson, Andrew C.
    Carr, James C.
    Li, Debiao
    Carroll, Timothy J.
    Omary, Reed A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (07) : 1131 - 1137
  • [29] PULSED X-RAY SOURCE FOR NON-INVASIVE DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY.
    Wiedemann, H.
    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1985, NS-32 (05)
  • [30] Prospective evaluation of suspected stenoocclusive disease of the intracranial artery: Combined MR angiography and CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography
    Hirai, T
    Korogi, Y
    Ono, K
    Nagano, M
    Maruoka, K
    Uemura, S
    Takahashi, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (01) : 93 - 101