Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Straw Resources by LCA in China

被引:24
|
作者
Shang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Song, Siqi [1 ]
Yang, Jingwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Elect Power Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jilin 132012, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Fac Built Environm, Bartlett, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FIRED POWER-GENERATION; RICE STRAW; WHEAT-STRAW; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; CROP STRAW; PARTICLEBOARD; EMISSIONS; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/4781805
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Crop straw, as a widely used biomass resource, can be processed to produce renewable energy and green products. However, about 70% of straw were burned in the open air, causing serious environmental pollution and air pollution. In order to reduce the burden on the environment, the different straw management strategies are comparatively studied and evaluated by applying the life-cycle assessment (LCA) method. Within the system boundary from cradle to grave, three alternative scenarios, including straw particleboard, straw cement-bonded particleboard, and straw direct combustion power generation, are compared with the current common treatment (straw open burning). The comprehensive inventory analysis on each treatment scenario is carried out in-depth, and the corresponding resource consumption and environmental impact of each treatment scenario are calculated, respectively. The LCA results showed that the environmental impacts of reusing crop straw to produce straw particleboard and cement-bonded particleboard (Scenario 1 and Scenario 2) is significantly reduced by 6% and 10%, by comparison with the use of wood resource. Greenhouse gas emissions from straw direct combustion power generation (Scenario 3) processes are reduced by 30% compared with coal power generation. From the environmental point of view, the scenario of straw particleboard product has the smallest impact on the environment, while straw open burning is not an advisable way due to the highest environmental impact from the highest greenhouse gas emissions and acidification effects. From the perspective of energy consumption, the energy consumption for the combustion power generation is the smallest in all scenarios. It is suggested that governments are supposed to construct reasonable scenarios for the straw disposition based on the local development status and condition. The research results can provide scientific guidance for the management strategy of the comprehensive utilization of straw resources.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation of straw resources in China
    Bi, Yuyun
    Gao, Chunyu
    Wang, Yajing
    Li, Baoyu
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25 (12): : 211 - 217
  • [2] The utilization of straw resources in China
    He, Jiaxin
    Zhuang, Tianhui
    [J]. BioTechnology: An Indian Journal, 2013, 8 (01) : 18 - 21
  • [3] Straw resources and their utilization in China
    Han, Lujia
    Yan, Qiaojuan
    Liu, Xiangyang
    Hu, Jinyou
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2002, 18 (03):
  • [4] Spatial suitability evaluation of the conversion and utilization of crop straw resources in China
    Qian, Binghong
    Shao, Chaofeng
    Yang, Feng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2024, 105
  • [5] Analysis and evaluation on energy utilization of main crop straw resources in China
    Cui, Ming
    Zhao, Lixin
    Tian, Yishui
    Meng, Haibo
    Sun, Liying
    Zhang, Yanli
    Wang, Fei
    Li, Bingfeng
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24 (12): : 291 - 296
  • [6] A comparative LCA of rice straw utilization for fuels and fertilizer in Thailand
    Silalertruksa, Thapat
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 412 - 419
  • [7] Comparative Study of Environmental Assessment Methods in the Evaluation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity-A Case Study in Xinjiang, China
    Zhang, Zhiping
    Xia, Fuqiang
    Yang, Degang
    Zhang, Yufang
    Cai, Tianyi
    Wu, Rongwei
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (17)
  • [8] The Assessment and Utilization of Straw Resources in China
    Wang Ya-jing
    Bi Yu-yun
    Gao Chun-yu
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2010, 9 (12): : 1807 - 1815
  • [9] The Assessment and Utilization of Straw Resources in China
    WANG Ya-jing
    [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2010, 9 (12) : 1807 - 1815
  • [10] Comparative Assessment of the Environmental and Economic Performance of Two Straw Utilization Pathways in China
    Li, Tong
    Wei, Guoxia
    Liu, Hanqiao
    Zhu, Yuwen
    Lin, Yanfei
    Han, Qianlong
    [J]. BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2024, : 2164 - 2176