Comparative Environmental Evaluation of Straw Resources by LCA in China

被引:24
|
作者
Shang, Xiaoyu [1 ,2 ]
Song, Siqi [1 ]
Yang, Jingwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Elect Power Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jilin 132012, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] UCL, Fac Built Environm, Bartlett, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; FIRED POWER-GENERATION; RICE STRAW; WHEAT-STRAW; MANUFACTURING PROCESS; WASTE MANAGEMENT; CROP STRAW; PARTICLEBOARD; EMISSIONS; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1155/2020/4781805
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Crop straw, as a widely used biomass resource, can be processed to produce renewable energy and green products. However, about 70% of straw were burned in the open air, causing serious environmental pollution and air pollution. In order to reduce the burden on the environment, the different straw management strategies are comparatively studied and evaluated by applying the life-cycle assessment (LCA) method. Within the system boundary from cradle to grave, three alternative scenarios, including straw particleboard, straw cement-bonded particleboard, and straw direct combustion power generation, are compared with the current common treatment (straw open burning). The comprehensive inventory analysis on each treatment scenario is carried out in-depth, and the corresponding resource consumption and environmental impact of each treatment scenario are calculated, respectively. The LCA results showed that the environmental impacts of reusing crop straw to produce straw particleboard and cement-bonded particleboard (Scenario 1 and Scenario 2) is significantly reduced by 6% and 10%, by comparison with the use of wood resource. Greenhouse gas emissions from straw direct combustion power generation (Scenario 3) processes are reduced by 30% compared with coal power generation. From the environmental point of view, the scenario of straw particleboard product has the smallest impact on the environment, while straw open burning is not an advisable way due to the highest environmental impact from the highest greenhouse gas emissions and acidification effects. From the perspective of energy consumption, the energy consumption for the combustion power generation is the smallest in all scenarios. It is suggested that governments are supposed to construct reasonable scenarios for the straw disposition based on the local development status and condition. The research results can provide scientific guidance for the management strategy of the comprehensive utilization of straw resources.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Collectable Amounts of Straw Resources and Their Distribution in China
    Ai, Binling
    Sheng, Zhanwu
    Zheng, Lili
    Shang, Wenting
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 23 : 441 - 444
  • [12] Comparative analysis of bridges' environmental impact based on LCA
    Liu, Muyu
    Gao, Hongwei
    Lin, Chi
    Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37 (06): : 108 - 111
  • [13] Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA
    Hossain, Md. Uzzal
    Poon, Chi Sun
    Lo, Irene M. C.
    Cheng, Jack C. P.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2016, 109 : 67 - 77
  • [14] Balancing straw returning and chemical fertilizers in China: Role of straw nutrient resources
    Yin, Huajun
    Zhao, Wenqiang
    Li, Ting
    Cheng, Xinying
    Liu, Qing
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 : 2695 - 2702
  • [15] A comparative environmental life cycle assessment of rice straw-based bioenergy projects in China
    Alengebawy, Ahmed
    Mohamed, Badr A.
    Ran, Yi
    Yang, Yi
    Pezzuolo, Andrea
    Samer, Mohamed
    Ai, Ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 212
  • [16] Environmental Evaluation of FRP in UK Highway Bridge Deck Replacement Applications Based on a Comparative LCA Study
    Zhang, Chao
    Lin, Wenxiu
    Abududdin, Muhammad
    Canning, Lee
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND BUILDING MATERIAL, PTS 1-4, 2012, 374-377 : 43 - +
  • [17] LCA applied to comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources
    Linares R.
    López-Uceda A.
    Piccinali A.
    Martínez-Ruedas C.
    Galvín A.P.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (31) : 44023 - 44035
  • [18] The use of LCA for the environmental evaluation of the recycling of galvanised steel
    Viklund-White, C
    ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 40 (03) : 292 - 299
  • [19] LCA tool for the environmental evaluation of potable water production
    Vince, Francois
    Aoustin, Ernmanuelle
    Breant, Philippe
    Marechal, Francois
    DESALINATION, 2008, 220 (1-3) : 37 - 56
  • [20] Environmental performance of power generation system in China based on LCA
    Su, Xing
    Zhang, Xu
    Yuan, Yuan
    2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AQUA SCIENCE, WATER RESOURCE AND LOW CARBON ENERGY, 2010, 1251 : 260 - +