Comparative Study of Environmental Assessment Methods in the Evaluation of Resources and Environmental Carrying Capacity-A Case Study in Xinjiang, China

被引:10
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiping [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Fuqiang [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Degang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yufang [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Tianyi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Rongwei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
resources and environmental carrying capacity; environmental quality standards; short board effect; weighted average; Xinjiang; LAND-USE CHANGE; BOSTEN LAKE; CARBON STORAGE; AIR-POLLUTION; SYSTEM; IMPACT; BASIN; DEPOSITION; PATTERNS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.3390/su11174666
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Scientifically assessing the environmental carrying capacity (ECC) based on an evaluation of environmental quality standards (EQSs) holds great significance for establishing a long-term monitoring and early warning mechanism for resources and environmental carrying capacity (RECC) and for coordinating the sustainable development of ecological environments and regional economies. However, it remains unclear whether the evaluation of EQSs based on the short board effect is suitable for environmental assessments under different natural environments. In this research, Xinjiang is used as a case study. Based on the evaluation of EQSs, the atmospheric environmental carrying capacity (AECC), water environmental carrying capacity (WECC) and comprehensive environmental carrying capacity (CECC) are assessed using the short board effect and the weighted average. Additionally, the suitability of ECC evaluation in RECC evaluation is discussed. The results show the following: (1) In the atmosphere, the overload of inhalable particles (PM10) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is more serious, while in water, the overload of total nitrogen (TN) is more serious. (2) The percentages of the AECC, WECC and CECC in overloaded counties and cities based on the short board effect are 84%, 45%, and 51%, respectively, while the percentages based on the weighted average are 32%, 6% and 7%, respectively. (3) The extreme effects of a single pollutant can be eliminated by the weighted average, which is more suitable for environmental assessments in Xinjiang. (4) In evaluating RECC monitoring and early warning systems, weighted average evaluation is used to assess the elements, and short board effect evaluation is used in the comprehensive integration to prevent the influence of the amplification of a single index. Thus, the interference of non-key factors in the regional system on the final evaluation results is reduced.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on the Assessment of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Yu, Peng
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND ECOINFORMATICS, PT 1, 2011, 158 : 269 - 274
  • [2] Evaluating and simulating resource and environmental carrying capacity in arid and semiarid regions: A case study of Xinjiang, China
    Han, Chuqiao
    Zheng, Jianghua
    Guan, Jingyun
    Yu, Danlin
    Lu, Binbin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 338
  • [3] Study on evaluation of environmental carrying capacity of pig breeding in Central China
    Leng, Bi-Bin
    Liu, Wei
    Ji, Xue-Qiang
    Zhang, Qi-Zhen
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS SCIENCE, ENERGY TECHNOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (MSETEE 2017), 2017, 81
  • [4] Assessment of water resources carrying capacity: A case study of Zhangye in China
    Zhu Yizhong
    [J]. ADVANCED TOPICS ON WATER RESOURCES, HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD IASME/WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WATER RESOURCES, HYDRAULICS AND HYDROLOGY (WHH '08), 2008, : 145 - 150
  • [5] Evaluation of Airport Environmental Carrying Capacity: A Case Study in Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport, China
    Wan, Lili
    Peng, Qiuping
    Zhang, Tianci
    Wang, Zhan
    Tian, Yong
    [J]. DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 2021
  • [6] Evaluation of resources and environmental carrying capacity and its spatial-temporal dynamic evolution: A case study in Shandong Province, China
    Chen, Yang
    Chen, Aitao
    Zhang, Danning
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 82
  • [7] Assessment of grassland carrying capacity drivers and evaluation of pasture-livestock balance: A case study of Xinjiang, China
    Wang, Guangyu
    Li, Yaoming
    Fan, Lianlian
    Ma, Xuexi
    Liang, Yuanye
    Hui, Tingting
    Zhang, Wenbo
    Li, Wei
    Mao, Jiefei
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2024, 55
  • [8] Risk Assessment of the Water Resources Carrying Capacity: A Case Study in North China
    Han, Yan
    Zhang, Shifeng
    Lv, Aifeng
    Zeng, Huiping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2022, 58 (06): : 1240 - 1254
  • [9] County-level environmental carrying capacity and spatial suitability of coastal resources: A case study of Zhuanghe, China
    Yin, Shusheng
    Guo, Jianke
    Han, Zenglin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [10] Geological resources and environmental carrying capacity evaluation review, theory,and practice in China
    Rui-min Li
    Zhi-qiang Yin
    Yi Wang
    Xiao-lei Li
    Qiong Liu
    Meng-meng Gao
    [J]. China Geology, 2018, 1 (04) : 556 - 565