Chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine skin antisepsis before upper limb surgery (CIPHUR): an international multicentre prospective cohort study

被引:4
|
作者
Wade, Ryckie G. [1 ,2 ]
Bourke, Grainne [1 ,2 ]
Wormald, Justin C. R. [3 ]
Totty, Joshua Philip [4 ,5 ]
Stanley, Guy Henry Morton [6 ]
Lewandowski, Andrew [7 ]
Rakhra, Sandeep Singh [8 ]
Gardiner, Matthew D. [3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Med Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp Trust, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[4] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Castle Hill Hosp, Cottingham, East Riding Of, England
[5] Hull York Med Sch, Ctr Clin Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[6] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[7] Mater Adults Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Alfred Hlth, Dept Anaesthesiol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Plast Surg, Slough, Berks, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ELECTIVE HAND SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; ANTIBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrab117
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common and costly complication of surgery. International guidelines recommend topical alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHX) before surgery. However, upper limb surgeons continue to use other antiseptics, citing a lack of applicable evidence, and concerns related to open wounds and tourniquets. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different topical antiseptics before upper limb surgery. Methods This international multicentre prospective cohort study recruited consecutive adults and children who underwent surgery distal to the shoulder joint. The intervention was use of CHX or povidone-iodine (PVI) antiseptics in either aqueous or alcoholic form. The primary outcome was SSI within 90 days. Mixed-effects time-to-event models were used to estimate the risk (hazard ratio (HR)) of SSI for patients undergoing elective and emergency upper limb surgery. Results A total of 2454 patients were included. The overall risk of SSI was 3.5 per cent. For elective upper limb surgery (1018 patients), alcoholic CHX appeared to be the most effective antiseptic, reducing the risk of SSI by 70 per cent (adjusted HR 0.30, 95 per cent c.i. 0.11 to 0.84), when compared with aqueous PVI. Concerning emergency upper limb surgery (1436 patients), aqueous PVI appeared to be the least effective antiseptic for preventing SSI; however, there was uncertainty in the estimates. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion The findings align with the global evidence base and international guidance, suggesting that alcoholic CHX should be used for skin antisepsis before clean (elective upper limb) surgery. For emergency (contaminated or dirty) upper limb surgery, the findings of this study were unclear and contradict the available evidence, concluding that further research is necessary. This international study recruited 2454 children and adults undergoing surgery on their upper limb (arm or hand), from 42 hospitals worldwide. The overall risk of infection after surgery was 3.5 per cent. Before planned (elective) surgery, if surgeons cleaned the skin with alcoholic chlorhexidine, then the risk of infection was reduced by 70 per cent.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Aqueous olanexidine versus aqueous povidone-iodine for surgical skin antisepsis on the incidence of surgical site infections after clean-contaminated surgery: a multicentre, prospective, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial
    Obara, Hideaki
    Takeuchi, Masashi
    Kawakubo, Hirofumi
    Shinoda, Masahiro
    Okabayashi, Koji
    Hayashi, Koki
    Sekimoto, Yasuhito
    Maeda, Yusuke
    Kondo, Takayuki
    Sato, Yasunori
    Kitagawa, Yuko
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (11): : 1281 - 1289
  • [42] Chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine as preoperative skin antisepsis for prevention of surgical site infection in cesarean delivery-a pilot randomized control trial
    Luwang, Athokpam Lenin
    Saha, Pradip Kumar
    Rohilla, Minakshi
    Sikka, Pooja
    Saha, Lekha
    Gautam, Vikas
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [43] Comparison of preoperative prophylaxis with povidone-iodine (5%) and moxifloxacin (0.5%) versus povidone-iodine (5%) alone: a prospective study from India
    Sreedhar, Sanjana S.
    Rajalakshmi, A. R.
    Nagarajan, Swathi
    Easow, Joshy M.
    Rajendran, Prabha
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [44] Chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone-iodine for nasal bacteria decolonization before transsphenoidal surgery in patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial
    Qian, Jinyu
    Lin, Jie
    Liu, Jin
    Gong, Yali
    Zheng, Shufang
    Mei, Lu
    Tang, Xin
    Xie, Lina
    Li, Hong
    Zhang, Chao
    Wang, Feilong
    Yang, Xue
    Hu, Rong
    Feng, Hua
    Xian, Jishu
    Tan, Binbin
    Chen, Yujie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 111 (01) : 697 - 705
  • [45] Skin asepsis protocols as a preventive measure of surgical site infections in dogs: chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine
    Belo, Luis
    Serrano, Isa
    Cunha, Eva
    Carneiro, Carla
    Tavares, Luis
    Miguel Carreira, L.
    Oliveira, Manuela
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2018, 14
  • [46] Povidone-iodine vs chlorhexidine alcohol for skin preparation in malignant and premalignant gynaecologic diseases: A randomized controlled study
    Gezer, Sener
    Yalvac, Hayriye M.
    Gungor, Kubra
    Yucesoy, Izzet
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 244 : 45 - 50
  • [47] Jumping on the Bandwagon: Comparing the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine Preoperative Skin Antiseptic in Preventing Surgical Site Infections Following Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery
    Beber, Samuel A.
    Sanborn, Ryan M.
    Miller, Patricia E.
    Kasser, James R.
    Waters, Peter M.
    Watkins, Colyn J.
    Shore, Benjamin J.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (01) : E39 - E44
  • [48] A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine for Infection Prevention in Clean Surgery
    Allen, George
    AORN JOURNAL, 2022, 115 (06) : 587 - 590
  • [49] Preoperative chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine antisepsis for preventing surgical site infection: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Dan
    Wang, Xi-Chen
    Yang, Zeng-Xi
    Gan, Jian-Xin
    Pan, Jie-Bin
    Yin, Lan-Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 44 : 176 - 184
  • [50] Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine-alcohol skin antisepsis protocols in major cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Boisson, Matthieu
    Allain, Geraldine
    Roussel, Jean-Christian
    d'Ostrevy, Nicolas
    Burbassi, Silvia
    Demondion, Pierre
    Mertes, Paul-Michel
    Labaste, Francois
    Kerforne, Thomas
    Rozec, Bertrand
    Eljezi, Vedat
    Zannis, Konstantinos
    Leprince, Pascal
    Oulehri, Walid
    Minville, Vincent
    Seguin, Sabrina
    Loiodice, Ambre
    Ruckly, Stephane
    Lucet, Jean-Christophe
    Timsit, Jean-Francois
    Mimoz, Olivier
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2024, : 2114 - 2124