Chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine skin antisepsis before upper limb surgery (CIPHUR): an international multicentre prospective cohort study

被引:4
|
作者
Wade, Ryckie G. [1 ,2 ]
Bourke, Grainne [1 ,2 ]
Wormald, Justin C. R. [3 ]
Totty, Joshua Philip [4 ,5 ]
Stanley, Guy Henry Morton [6 ]
Lewandowski, Andrew [7 ]
Rakhra, Sandeep Singh [8 ]
Gardiner, Matthew D. [3 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Med Res, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Leeds Teaching Hosp Trust, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[4] Hull Univ Teaching Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Castle Hill Hosp, Cottingham, East Riding Of, England
[5] Hull York Med Sch, Ctr Clin Sci, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England
[6] Fiona Stanley Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Murdoch, WA, Australia
[7] Mater Adults Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Alfred Hlth, Dept Anaesthesiol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Plast Surg, Slough, Berks, England
来源
BJS OPEN | 2021年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ELECTIVE HAND SURGERY; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; ANTIBIOTICS;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrab117
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common and costly complication of surgery. International guidelines recommend topical alcoholic chlorhexidine (CHX) before surgery. However, upper limb surgeons continue to use other antiseptics, citing a lack of applicable evidence, and concerns related to open wounds and tourniquets. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different topical antiseptics before upper limb surgery. Methods This international multicentre prospective cohort study recruited consecutive adults and children who underwent surgery distal to the shoulder joint. The intervention was use of CHX or povidone-iodine (PVI) antiseptics in either aqueous or alcoholic form. The primary outcome was SSI within 90 days. Mixed-effects time-to-event models were used to estimate the risk (hazard ratio (HR)) of SSI for patients undergoing elective and emergency upper limb surgery. Results A total of 2454 patients were included. The overall risk of SSI was 3.5 per cent. For elective upper limb surgery (1018 patients), alcoholic CHX appeared to be the most effective antiseptic, reducing the risk of SSI by 70 per cent (adjusted HR 0.30, 95 per cent c.i. 0.11 to 0.84), when compared with aqueous PVI. Concerning emergency upper limb surgery (1436 patients), aqueous PVI appeared to be the least effective antiseptic for preventing SSI; however, there was uncertainty in the estimates. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion The findings align with the global evidence base and international guidance, suggesting that alcoholic CHX should be used for skin antisepsis before clean (elective upper limb) surgery. For emergency (contaminated or dirty) upper limb surgery, the findings of this study were unclear and contradict the available evidence, concluding that further research is necessary. This international study recruited 2454 children and adults undergoing surgery on their upper limb (arm or hand), from 42 hospitals worldwide. The overall risk of infection after surgery was 3.5 per cent. Before planned (elective) surgery, if surgeons cleaned the skin with alcoholic chlorhexidine, then the risk of infection was reduced by 70 per cent.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antisepsis of the skin before spinal surgery with povidone iodine-alcohol followed by chlorhexidine gluconate-alcohol versus povidone iodine-alcohol applied twice for the prevention of contamination of the wound by bacteria
    Patrick, S.
    McDowell, A.
    Lee, A.
    Frau, A.
    Martin, U.
    Gardner, E.
    McLorinan, G.
    Eames, N.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2017, 99B (10): : 1354 - 1365
  • [32] Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine as skin preparation before blood culture - A randomized, controlled trial
    Mimoz, O
    Karim, A
    Mercat, A
    Cosseron, M
    Falissard, B
    Parker, F
    Richard, C
    Samii, K
    Nordmann, P
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (11) : 834 - 837
  • [33] A prospective randomised trial to compare the efficacy of povidone-iodine 10% and chlorhexidine 2% for skin disinfection
    Kulkarni, Atul P.
    Awode, Rishikesh M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 57 (03) : 270 - 275
  • [34] Preoperative Antisepsis with Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Shi
    Chen, Jun Wu
    Guo, Bin
    Xu, Chun Cheng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (05) : 1412 - 1424
  • [35] Preoperative Antisepsis with Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shi Chen
    Jun Wu Chen
    Bin Guo
    Chun Cheng Xu
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1412 - 1424
  • [36] Surgical Skin Prep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine
    Allen, George
    AORN JOURNAL, 2020, 112 (04) : 421 - 424
  • [37] Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Compared with Povidone-Iodine Preoperative Skin Antisepsis for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tolcher, Mary Catherine
    Whitham, Megan D.
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Clark, Steven L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 36 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [38] Systemic iodine absorption after preoperative antisepsis using povidone-iodine in cataract surgery -: An open controlled study
    Below, H
    Behrens-Baumann, W
    Bernhardt, C
    Völzke, H
    Kramer, A
    Rudolph, P
    DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 212 : 41 - 46
  • [39] Preoperative skin asepsis protocols using chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in veterinary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marchionatti, Emma
    Constant, Caroline
    Steiner, Adrian
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2022, 51 (05) : 744 - 752
  • [40] Optimal Timing of Preoperative Skin Preparation with Povidone-Iodine for Spine Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
    Yasuda, Tatsuya
    Hasegawa, Tomohiko
    Yamato, Yu
    Kobayashi, Sho
    Togawa, Daisuke
    Arima, Hideyuki
    Matsuyama, Yukihiro
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (03) : 423 - 426