A modelling framework for householder decision-making for wildfire emergencies

被引:36
|
作者
Lovreglio, Ruggiero [1 ]
Kuligowski, Erica [2 ]
Gwynne, Steve [3 ]
Strahan, Ken [4 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] NIST, Fire Res Div, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[3] Movement Strategies, London, England
[4] Strahan Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Wildfire; Human behaviour; Decision-making; Householder; Modelling; EASTERN AUSTRALIAN HOUSEHOLDERS; BLACK SATURDAY BUSHFIRES; TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; HUMAN-BEHAVIOR; EXIT CHOICE; SIMULATION-MODELS; EVACUATION; URBAN; UNDERSTAND; ARCHETYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101274
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The occurrence of wildfire threats has increased in the last few decades creating serious challenges for thousands of communities around the world. Understanding the physical and social dynamics imposed by wildfires is fundamental to assessing and reducing the ensuing risk to different communities. Although, several studies investigating household wildfire risk perception and decision-making are available in the literature, modelling solutions to predict household behaviour in wildfire scenarios are still in their early stages. Hence the lack of a behavioural model suitable for embedding within a simulation tool. In this paper, we propose a mathematical framework aimed at simulating how householders perceive the risk associated to wildfires and how they take protective actions in response to such threats. A conceptual Wildfire Decision Model, based on nine assumptions derived from existing literature on human behaviour in wildfires, is introduced. A mathematical framework is then proposed to implement such a model within a simulation tool. The proposed modelling solution can help identify the information required to generate new dynamic and behavioural travel demand models for wildfire evacuation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A decision-making framework for precision marketing
    You, Zhen
    Si, Yain-Whar
    Zhang, Defu
    Zeng, XiangXiang
    Leung, Stephen C. H.
    Li, Tao
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (07) : 3357 - 3367
  • [32] A FRAMEWORK FOR FOOD SAFETY DECISION-MAKING
    不详
    [J]. FOOD PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 14 (05): : 104 - 104
  • [33] A NEW DECISION-MAKING SYSTEMS FRAMEWORK
    Molloy, Ella-Mae
    Siemieniuch, Carys
    Sinclair, Murray
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ERGONOMICS 2008, 2008, : 55 - +
  • [34] AN INTERACTION FRAMEWORK OF CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING
    PUNJ, GN
    STEWART, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 10 (02) : 181 - 196
  • [35] Probability-Based Wildfire Risk Measure for Decision-Making
    Rodriguez-Martinez, Adan
    Vitoriano, Begona
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (04)
  • [36] Relative risk assessments for decision-making related to uncharacteristic wildfire
    Irwin, LL
    Wigley, TB
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 211 (1-2) : 1 - 2
  • [37] Research on Perfection of "Incremental" Emergency Decision-making Model in Emergencies
    Zhu Xiao-ning
    Liu Zhong-guan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (8TH), VOL III, 2012, : 621 - 627
  • [38] Public nutrition in emergencies: An overview of debates, dilemmas and decision-making
    Young, H
    [J]. DISASTERS, 1999, 23 (04) : 277 - 291
  • [39] Vascular Emergencies and Shared Decision-making in Patients With Thunderclap Headache
    Akhter, Murtaza
    Chen, Shih-Pin
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (10) : 1194 - 1195
  • [40] Knowledge Mapping and Modelling in Group Decision-Making
    Brozova, Helena
    Subrt, Tomas
    [J]. AGRARIAN PERSPECTIVES XVIII, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 115 - 115