A modelling framework for householder decision-making for wildfire emergencies

被引:36
|
作者
Lovreglio, Ruggiero [1 ]
Kuligowski, Erica [2 ]
Gwynne, Steve [3 ]
Strahan, Ken [4 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Sch Built Environm, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] NIST, Fire Res Div, Gaithersburg, MD USA
[3] Movement Strategies, London, England
[4] Strahan Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Wildfire; Human behaviour; Decision-making; Householder; Modelling; EASTERN AUSTRALIAN HOUSEHOLDERS; BLACK SATURDAY BUSHFIRES; TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL; HUMAN-BEHAVIOR; EXIT CHOICE; SIMULATION-MODELS; EVACUATION; URBAN; UNDERSTAND; ARCHETYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101274
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The occurrence of wildfire threats has increased in the last few decades creating serious challenges for thousands of communities around the world. Understanding the physical and social dynamics imposed by wildfires is fundamental to assessing and reducing the ensuing risk to different communities. Although, several studies investigating household wildfire risk perception and decision-making are available in the literature, modelling solutions to predict household behaviour in wildfire scenarios are still in their early stages. Hence the lack of a behavioural model suitable for embedding within a simulation tool. In this paper, we propose a mathematical framework aimed at simulating how householders perceive the risk associated to wildfires and how they take protective actions in response to such threats. A conceptual Wildfire Decision Model, based on nine assumptions derived from existing literature on human behaviour in wildfires, is introduced. A mathematical framework is then proposed to implement such a model within a simulation tool. The proposed modelling solution can help identify the information required to generate new dynamic and behavioural travel demand models for wildfire evacuation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Decision-making during obstetric emergencies: A narrative approach
    Raoust, Gabriel M.
    Bergstrom, Johan
    Bolin, Maria
    Hansson, Stefan R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [23] Knowledge creation and reliable decision-making in complex emergencies
    Kruke, Bjorn Ivar
    Olsen, Odd Einar
    [J]. DISASTERS, 2012, 36 (02) : 212 - 232
  • [24] A Semantic Framework for Decision Making in Forest Fire Emergencies
    Masa, Panagiota
    Kintzios, Spyridon
    Vasileiou, Zoe
    Meditskos, Georgios
    Vrochidis, Stefanos
    Kompatsiaris, Ioannis
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (16):
  • [25] Modelling of Decision-making in Crisis Management
    Bartosikova, Romana
    Bilikova, Jana
    Strohmandl, Jan
    Sefcik, Vladimir
    Taraba, Pavel
    [J]. CRAFTING GLOBAL COMPETITIVE ECONOMIES: 2020 VISION STRATEGIC PLANNING & SMART IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS I-IV, 2014, : 1479 - 1483
  • [26] MODELLING OF DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK FOR SELECTION TECHNOLOGICAL ADEQUACY SYSTEM MEDIA FACADES
    Cikic Tovarovic, Jasna
    Ivanovic Sekularac, Jelena
    Sekularac, Nenad
    [J]. ARCHITECTURE CIVIL ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 9 (03) : 55 - 70
  • [27] The application of a hybrid simulation modelling framework as a decision-making tool for TPM improvement
    Oleghe, Omogbai
    Salonitis, Konstantinos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY IN MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING, 2019, 25 (03) : 476 - 498
  • [28] A Decision-Making Framework for Sediment Contamination
    Chapman, Peter M.
    Anderson, Janette
    [J]. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 1 (03) : 163 - 173
  • [29] A Bayesian decision-making framework for replication
    Hardwicke, Tom E.
    Tessler, Michael Henry
    Peloquin, Benjamin N.
    Frank, Michael C.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 41
  • [30] A FOODSERVICE INFORMATION FRAMEWORK FOR DECISION-MAKING
    MATTHEWS, ME
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 37 (12) : 46 - &