24-Month Clinical Performance of a Universal Adhesive on Non-Carious Cervical Lesions: Self-Etch and Etch-and Rinse Techniques

被引:3
|
作者
Cruz, Joana [1 ]
Silva, Ana Luisa [1 ]
Eira, Raquel [1 ]
Coito, Catarina [1 ]
Sousa, Bernardo Romao [1 ]
Lopes, Maria Manuela [2 ]
Cavalheiro, Alexandre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Dent Med, Dept Operat Dent, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Dent Med, Rua Prof Teresa Ambrosio,Cidade Univ, P-1600277 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY | 2021年 / 23卷 / 05期
关键词
clinical trial; self-etch mode; etch-and-rinse mode; universal adhesive; application modes; non-carious cervical lesions; POLYACID-MODIFIED RESIN; COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS; BOND STRENGTH; GLASS-IONOMER; SINGLE-STEP; ENAMEL; DENTIN; ADAPTATION; IMMEDIATE; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3290/j.jad.b2000173
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the 24-month clinical performance of Adhese Universal (ADH) (Ivoclar Vivadent) using two different application modes (etch-and-rinse vs self-etch) when restoring non-carious cervical lesions. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients participated in this study. A total of 117 non-carious cervical lesion restorations (N = 117) were assigned to two groups: 1) ADH in the etch-and-rinse mode (n = 59) and 2) ADH in the self-etch mode (n = 58). The same resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent) was used for all restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 24 months using the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. The results were analyzed statistically using the McNemar test (a = 0.05) and a generalized estimating equation. Results: In self-etch mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.031), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.031) between baseline and the end of the 24-month period. In the etch-and-rinse mode, significant differences were found for marginal coloring (p = 0.004), fractures/retention (p = 0.002), marginal adaptation (p = 0.002), and hypersensitivity (p = 0.000). Significant differences were also detected between groups at 24 months for fractures/retention (p = 0.001). At 24 months, 10 restorations of the etch-and-rinse group were lost and 2 restorations of the self-etch group were lost. Conclusion: In terms of fractures and retention criteria, this universal adhesive obtained better results when applied in self-etch mode than in etch-and-rinse mode.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 387
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Two-year clinical effectiveness of a self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
    Peumans, M.
    Van Meerbeek, B.
    De Munck, J.
    Lambrechts, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B126 - B126
  • [42] SEM-EDS nanoleakage evaluation of universal-adhesive-systems with etch-and-rinse and self-etch approach
    Certan, Mihai
    Polido, Maria
    Brito, Jose
    Azul, Ana Cristina
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2019, 51 : S97 - S97
  • [43] Self-etch or etch-and-rinse mode did not affect the microshear bond strength of a universal adhesive to primary dentin
    Thanaratikul, Benjaporn
    Santiwong, Busayarat
    Harnirattisai, Choltacha
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2016, 35 (02) : 174 - 179
  • [44] Effect of the Adhesive Strategy on Clinical Performance and Marginal Integrity of a Universal Adhesive in Non-Carious Cervical Lesions in a Randomized 36-Month Study
    Haak, Rainer
    Stache, Gesa
    Schneider, Hartmut
    Haefer, Matthias
    Schmalz, Gerhard
    Schulz-Kornas, Ellen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [45] Six-year Clinical Performance of a 2-step Self-etch Adhesive in Noncarious Cervical Lesions
    Peumans, Marleen
    Vandormael, Stefanie
    Heeren, Anna
    De Munck, Jan
    Van Meerbeek, Bart
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 23 (03): : 201 - 215
  • [46] Clinical Evaluation of Self-etch and Total-etch Adhesive Systems in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Two-year Report
    Burgess, J. O.
    Sadid-Zadeh, R.
    Cakir, D.
    Ramp, L. C.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 38 (05) : 477 - 487
  • [47] Clinical evaluation of Giomer and self-etch adhesive compared with nanofilled resin composite and etch-and-rinse adhesive - Results at 8 years
    Tian, Fucong
    Mu, Haili
    Shi, Yang
    Chen, Xiaobo
    Zou, Xiaoying
    Gao, Xuejun
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2024, 40 (07) : 1088 - 1095
  • [48] Etch-and-rinse versus self-etch strategy of a universal adhesive in different application methods at the bonding interface of fiber post cementation
    Oliveira Barros, Antonia Patricia
    Alencar, Cristiane de Melo
    Zambon, Matheus
    de Andrade, Marcelo Ferrarezi
    Fernandez, Eduardo
    Kuga, Milton Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2023, 35 (08) : 1249 - 1256
  • [49] Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL - a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Oz, Fatma Dilsad
    Ergin, Esra
    Canatan, Simge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2019, 27
  • [50] Cytotoxicity of Etch-and-Rinse, Self-Etch, and Universal Dental Adhesive Systems in Fibroblast Cell Line 3T3
    Pupo, Yasmine Mendes
    de Freitas Bernardo, Cintia Fernanda
    de Souza, Francielly Fernanda de Freitas A.
    Michel, Milton Domingos
    de Morais Ribeiro, Camila Nunes
    Germano, Sandro
    Maluf, Daniela Florencio
    [J]. SCANNING, 2017,