Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users

Temporal envelope cues convey important speech information for cochlear implant (CI) users. Many studies have explored CI users' single-channel temporal envelope processing. However, in clinical Cl speech processors, temporal envelope information is processed by multiple channels. Previous studies have shown that amplitude modulation frequency discrimination (AMFD) thresholds are better when temporal envelopes are delivered to multiple rather than single channels. In clinical fitting, current levels on single channels must often be reduced to accommodate multi-channel loudness summation. As such, it is unclear whether the multi-channel advantage in AMFD observed in previous studies was due to coherent envelope information distributed across the cochlea or to greater loudness associated with multi-channel stimulation. In this study, single- and multi-channel AMFD thresholds were measured in CI users. Multi-channel component electrodes were either widely or narrowly spaced to vary the degree of overlap between neural populations. The reference amplitude modulation (AM) frequency was 100 Hz, and coherent modulation was applied to all channels. In Experiment 1, single- and multi-channel AMFD thresholds were measured at similar loudness. In this case, current levels on component channels were higher for single-than for multi-channel AM stimuli, and the modulation depth was approximately 100% of the perceptual dynamic range (i.e., between threshold and maximum acceptable loudness). Results showed no significant difference in AMFD thresholds between similarly loud single- and multi-channel modulated stimuli. In Experiment 2, single- and multi-channel AMFD thresholds were compared at substantially different loudness. In this case, current levels on component channels were the same for single- and multi-channel stimuli ("summation-adjusted" current levels) and the same range of modulation (in dB) was applied to the component channels for both single- and multi-channel testing. With the summation-adjusted current levels, loudness was lower with single than with multiple channels and the AM depth resulted in substantial stimulation below single-channel audibility, thereby reducing the perceptual range of AM. Results showed that AMFD thresholds were significantly better with multiple channels than with any of the single component channels. There was no significant effect of the distribution of electrodes on multi-channel AMFD thresholds. The results suggest that increased loudness due to multi-channel summation may contribute to the multi-channel advantage in AMFD, and that overall loudness may matter more than the distribution of envelope information in the cochlea. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.