How Footwear Is Assessed in Patient Reported Measures for People with Arthritis: A Scoping Review

被引:0
|
作者
Tehan, Peta E. [1 ]
Carroll, Matthew [1 ]
Dalbeth, Nicola [2 ]
Rome, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Hlth & Environm Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; RISK-FACTORS; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; DISABILITY; IMPAIRMENT; MANAGEMENT; SCALE; SHOES;
D O I
10.1002/pmrj.12182
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: In people with arthritis, footwear may influence foot function, pain, and mobility. In order to measure the effectiveness of interventions and patient experience, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are frequently used. The aim of the scoping review was to identify footwear item content within foot-specific PROMs and PREMs used in people with arthritis. Method: Original studies that developed or validated a footwear-inclusive PROM or PREM for use in people with arthritis affecting the foot were included. A comprehensive search was conducted using AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Ovid Emcare and Embase. A content analysis of extracted footwear content items was performed, by coding item content and grouping into broad themes, then further narrowing down and defining themes under five main categories. Results: Nineteen articles satisfied inclusion criteria for this scoping exercise. Eleven PROMs met the inclusion criteria, five of which were designed for use in disease-specific populations (rheumatoid arthritis and gout) and six designed for generic populations. Categories of the footwear specific content from the PROMs included pain, impairment and function, shoe-specific characteristics, and psychosocial aspects. None of the included PROMs assessed footwear satisfaction. Eight PREMs relating to footwear experiences were identified. Seven of the PREMs were disease specific (inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic sclerosis) and one was generic. Content of the footwear-related items of the included PREMs were categorized under pain, impairment and function, footwear satisfaction, and shoe-specific characteristics. None of the PREM studies reported on psychosocial aspects of footwear. Conclusions: Many different instruments have been used to measure the experience of footwear in patients with arthritis. However, no comprehensive tool that evaluates footwear and its relationship with pain, impairment, and disability; the psychosocial aspects of footwear; specific footwear features; and satisfaction is currently available for use in people with arthritis.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor
    Balch, Jeremy A.
    Chatham, A. Hayes
    Hong, Philip K. W.
    Manganiello, Lauren
    Baskaran, Naveen
    Bihorac, Azra
    Shickel, Benjamin
    Moseley, Ray E.
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 7
  • [42] Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Dysphagia Research Following Stroke: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis
    Moloney, Jennifer
    Walshe, Margaret
    Regan, Julie
    DYSPHAGIA, 2023, 38 (01) : 181 - 190
  • [43] Patient reported outcome measures for measuring dignity in palliative and end of life care: a scoping review
    Johnston, Bridget
    Flemming, Kate
    Narayanasamy, Melanie Jay
    Coole, Carolyn
    Hardy, Beth
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [44] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity: a systematic review
    Pickles, Tim
    Choy, Ernest
    Horton, Mike
    Christensen, Karl Bang
    Phillips, Rhiannon
    Gillespie, David
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Beecher, Claire
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S149 - S149
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures For Rheumatoid Arthritis: Minimal Important Differences Review
    Kitchen, Helen
    Hansen, Brian Bekker
    Abetz, Linda
    Hojbjerre, Lise
    Strandberg-Larsen, Martin
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2013, 65 : S965 - S965
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures for rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: a systematic review
    Pickles, Tim
    Ijaz, Tanzeel
    Horton, Mike
    Christensen, Karl Bang
    Phillips, Rhiannon
    Gillespie, David
    Choy, Ernest
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S158 - S158
  • [47] Scale Linking to Enable Patient-Reported Outcome Performance Measures Assessed with Different Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Katzan, Irene L.
    Fan, Youran
    Griffith, Sandra D.
    Crane, Paul K.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    Cella, David
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (08) : 1143 - 1149
  • [48] Exploring patient perspectives: orthognathic surgery outcomes and experiences assessed by patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures
    Baniulyte, Gabriele
    Esson, Michael
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 62 (08): : 722 - 728
  • [49] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures used following hip or knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
    Karimijashni, Motahareh
    Abbasalipour, Shokoofih
    Westby, Marie
    Ramsay, Tim
    Beaule, Paul E.
    Poitras, Stephane
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [50] Instruments for assessing patient-reported experience measures among patients with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review
    Tint, Soe Sandi
    Oo, Myo Zin
    Buawangpong, Nida
    Jiraporncharoen, Wichuda
    Wiwatkunupakarn, Nutchar
    Rerkasem, Kittipan
    Kulprachakarn, Kanokwan
    Chuljerm, Hataichanok
    O'Brien, Timothy E.
    Mathur, Rohini
    Angkurawaranon, Chaisiri
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2025, 9 (01)