Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor

被引:0
|
作者
Balch, Jeremy A. [1 ,2 ]
Chatham, A. Hayes [2 ]
Hong, Philip K. W. [1 ]
Manganiello, Lauren [3 ]
Baskaran, Naveen [4 ]
Bihorac, Azra [4 ]
Shickel, Benjamin [4 ]
Moseley, Ray E. [4 ]
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
关键词
machine learn; palliative care; patient reported outcome; fairness; clinical decision support; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL OUTCOMES; OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFT; INCAPACITATED PATIENTS; CARTILAGE DEFECTS; OF-LIFE; KNEE; IMPROVEMENTS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1477447
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background The algorithmic patient preference predictor (PPP) has been proposed to aid in decision making for incapacitated patients in the absence of advanced directives. Ethical and legal challenges aside, multiple practical barriers exist for building a personalized PPP. Here, we examine previous work using machine learning to predict patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for capacitated patients undergoing diverse procedures, therapies, and life events. Demonstrating robust performance in predicting PROMs for capacitated patients could suggest opportunities for developing a model tailored to incapacitated ones.Methods We performed a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to capture studies using machine learning to predict PROMs following a medical event alongside qualitative studies exploring a theoretical PPP.Results Sixty-eight studies used machine learning to evaluate PROMs; an additional 20 studies focused on a theoretical PPP. For PROMs, orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and spinal surgeries (n = 12) were the most common medical event. Studies used demographic (n = 30), pre-event PROMs (n = 52), comorbidities (n = 29), social determinants of health (n = 30), and intraoperative variables (n = 124) as predictors. Thirty-four different PROMs were used as the target outcome. Evaluation metrics varied by task, but performance was overall poor to moderate for the best reported scores. In models that used feature importance, pre-event PROMs were the most predictive of post-event PROMs. Fairness assessments were rare (n = 6). These findings reinforce the necessity of the integrating patient values and preferences, beyond demographic factors, to improve the development of personalized PPP models for incapacitated patients.Conclusion The primary objective of a PPP is to estimate patient-reported quality of life following an intervention. Use of machine learning to predict PROMs for capacitated patients introduces challenges and opportunities for building a personalized PPP for incapacitated patients without advanced directives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using artificial intelligence to predict patient outcomes from patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Zuzanna Wójcik
    Vania Dimitrova
    Lorraine Warrington
    Galina Velikova
    Kate Absolom
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 23 (1)
  • [2] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [3] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [4] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Ana Janic
    Sylvie Bowden
    Sarah Levy
    Jennifer Stinson
    Helen Dimaras
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [5] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [6] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures for rehabilitation hospitals: a scoping review
    Thwaites, Claire
    Rowntree, Nicole
    Hodge, Anita
    Fowler-Davis, Sally
    McKercher, Jonathan P.
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Rovtar, Vincent
    Knight, Matthew
    Jones, Cathy
    Morris, Meg E.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (4-6) : 278 - 290
  • [9] Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
    Torbjornsen, Astrid
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    Singstad, Tone
    Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
    Holmen, Heidi
    BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol
    Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Sovso, Morten Breinholt
    Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian
    Pedersen, Mona Kyndi
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3102 - 3112