Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor

被引:0
|
作者
Balch, Jeremy A. [1 ,2 ]
Chatham, A. Hayes [2 ]
Hong, Philip K. W. [1 ]
Manganiello, Lauren [3 ]
Baskaran, Naveen [4 ]
Bihorac, Azra [4 ]
Shickel, Benjamin [4 ]
Moseley, Ray E. [4 ]
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
关键词
machine learn; palliative care; patient reported outcome; fairness; clinical decision support; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL OUTCOMES; OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFT; INCAPACITATED PATIENTS; CARTILAGE DEFECTS; OF-LIFE; KNEE; IMPROVEMENTS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1477447
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background The algorithmic patient preference predictor (PPP) has been proposed to aid in decision making for incapacitated patients in the absence of advanced directives. Ethical and legal challenges aside, multiple practical barriers exist for building a personalized PPP. Here, we examine previous work using machine learning to predict patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for capacitated patients undergoing diverse procedures, therapies, and life events. Demonstrating robust performance in predicting PROMs for capacitated patients could suggest opportunities for developing a model tailored to incapacitated ones.Methods We performed a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to capture studies using machine learning to predict PROMs following a medical event alongside qualitative studies exploring a theoretical PPP.Results Sixty-eight studies used machine learning to evaluate PROMs; an additional 20 studies focused on a theoretical PPP. For PROMs, orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and spinal surgeries (n = 12) were the most common medical event. Studies used demographic (n = 30), pre-event PROMs (n = 52), comorbidities (n = 29), social determinants of health (n = 30), and intraoperative variables (n = 124) as predictors. Thirty-four different PROMs were used as the target outcome. Evaluation metrics varied by task, but performance was overall poor to moderate for the best reported scores. In models that used feature importance, pre-event PROMs were the most predictive of post-event PROMs. Fairness assessments were rare (n = 6). These findings reinforce the necessity of the integrating patient values and preferences, beyond demographic factors, to improve the development of personalized PPP models for incapacitated patients.Conclusion The primary objective of a PPP is to estimate patient-reported quality of life following an intervention. Use of machine learning to predict PROMs for capacitated patients introduces challenges and opportunities for building a personalized PPP for incapacitated patients without advanced directives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Mudunna, Chethana
    Caruso, Marisa
    Ahern, Susannah
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [42] Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review
    Shelton, Jaclyn
    Casey, Sierra
    Puhl, Nathan
    Buckingham, Jeanette
    Yacyshyn, Elaine
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [43] Validated patient reported outcome measures in speech-language pathology: A scoping review of adult practice
    Gardner, Danielle
    Mitchell, Verity
    Frakking, Thuy
    Weir, Kelly Ann
    Canning, Angie
    Wenke, Rachel Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [44] Response rates in clinical quality registries and databases that collect patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    Chethana Mudunna
    Marisa Caruso
    Susannah Ahern
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21
  • [45] Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review
    Alarilla, Anne
    Terrell, Katharine
    Kelly, Paula
    Chesters, Heather
    Gibson, Faith
    Oldham, Geralyn
    Sell, Debbie
    Davies, Gwyneth
    Wray, Jo
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [46] The use of patient-reported outcome and experience measures for health policy purposes: A scoping review in oncology
    Minvielle, E.
    Fierobe, A.
    Fourcade, A.
    Ferrua, M.
    di Palma, M.
    Scott, F.
    Mir, O.
    HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 129
  • [47] Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Adult Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Scoping Review and Graphical Visualization of the Evidence
    Slayter, Jeremy
    Casey, Lauren
    O'Connell, Colleen
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2023, 10 (02) : 239 - 250
  • [48] Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review
    Hoque, Sheymonti S.
    Ahern, Susannah
    O'Connell, Helen E.
    Romero, Lorena
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 25 (06):
  • [49] Correction to: Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Dysphagia Research Following Stroke: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis
    Jennifer Moloney
    Julie Regan
    Margaret Walshe
    Dysphagia, 2023, 38 : 191 - 191
  • [50] Evaluation of Domains of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Recovery After Childbirth A Scoping and Systematic Review
    Sultan, Pervez
    Sadana, Nishant
    Sharawi, Nadir
    Blake, Lindsay
    El-Boghdadly, Kariem
    Falvo, Andrea
    Ciechanowicz, Sarah
    Athar, Waseem
    Shah, Raj
    Guo, Nan
    Jensen, Sally
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Cella, David
    Carvalho, Brendan
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (05)