Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review

被引:9
|
作者
Shelton, Jaclyn [1 ]
Casey, Sierra [1 ]
Puhl, Nathan [1 ]
Buckingham, Jeanette [1 ]
Yacyshyn, Elaine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Med & Dent, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
TREAT-TO-TARGET; UNITED-STATES; ARTHRITIS; RECOMMENDATIONS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0253615
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective This scoping review aims to characterize the current literature on electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) in rheumatology and assess the feasibility and utility of ePROMs and mobile health technology in the management of rheumatic disease. Introduction Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are commonly used in rheumatology as they are important markers of disease activity and overall function, encourage shared decision-making, and are associated with high rates of patient satisfaction. With the widespread use of mobile devices, there is increasing interest in the use of mobile health technology to collect electronic PROMs (ePROM). Inclusion criteria All primary studies that involve the collection of ePROMs using mobile devices by individuals with a rheumatic disease were included. Articles were excluded if ePROMs were measured during clinic appointments. Methods A scoping review was performed using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL with index terms and key words related to "patient-reported outcome measures", "rheumatic diseases", and "mobile health technology". Results A total of 462 records were identified after duplicates were removed. Of the 70 studies selected for review, 43% were conference proceedings and 57% were journal articles, with the majority published in 2016 or later. Inflammatory arthritis was the most common rheumatic disease studied. Generic ePROMs were used over three times more often than disease-specific ePROMs. A total of 39 (56%) studies directly evaluated the feasibility of ePROMs in clinical practice, 19 (27%) were clinical trials that used ePROMs as study endpoints, 9 (13%) were focus groups or surveys on smartphone application development, and 3 (4%) did not fit into one defined category. Conclusion The use of ePROMs in rheumatology is a growing area of research and shows significant utility in clinical practice, particularly in inflammatory arthritis. Further research is needed to better characterize the feasibility of ePROMs in rheumatology and their impact on patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [2] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Ana Janic
    Sylvie Bowden
    Sarah Levy
    Jennifer Stinson
    Helen Dimaras
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4
  • [3] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [4] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445
  • [5] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [6] Patient-reported outcome measures for rehabilitation hospitals: a scoping review
    Thwaites, Claire
    Rowntree, Nicole
    Hodge, Anita
    Fowler-Davis, Sally
    McKercher, Jonathan P.
    Weerasekara, Ishanka
    Rovtar, Vincent
    Knight, Matthew
    Jones, Cathy
    Morris, Meg E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (4-6) : 278 - 290
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [8] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Youth Mental Health Services: A Scoping and Qualitative Review
    Amarbayan, Mungunzul Megan
    Carpenter, Travis
    Santana, Maria
    Zwicker, Jennifer
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S131 - S131
  • [9] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Integration Into Electronic Health Records
    Pitzen, Collette
    Larson, Jasmine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (10) : 867 - +
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures in the emergency department: a scoping review protocol
    Poulsen, Ninna Rysholt
    Schougaard, Liv Marit Valen
    Sovso, Morten Breinholt
    Leutscher, Peter Derek Christian
    Pedersen, Mona Kyndi
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (11) : 3102 - 3112