CATEGORIZATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULI BY PIGEONS

被引:13
|
作者
Berg, Mark E. [1 ]
Grace, Randolph C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Richard Stockton Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Pomona, NJ 08240 USA
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Psychol, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
关键词
multidimensional categorization; Gabor patch; General Linear Classifier; optimality; pigeons; INTEGRATION; BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION; REINFORCERS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.2010.94-305
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Six pigeons responded in a visual category learning task in which the stimuli were dimensionally separable Gabor patches that varied in frequency and orientation. We compared performance in two conditions which varied in terms of whether accurate performance required that responding be controlled jointly by frequency and orientation, or selectively by frequency. Results showed that pigeons learned both category tasks, with average overall accuracies of 85.5% and 82% in the joint and selective control conditions, respectively. Although perfect performance was possible, responding for all pigeons fell short of optimality. Model comparison analyses showed that the General Linear Classifier (GLC; Ashby, 1992) provided a better account of responding in the joint control condition than unidimensional models, but a unidimensional model fitted better for the condition that required selective control by frequency. Our results show that pigeons' responding in a visual categorization task can be controlled jointly or selectively by stimulus dimensions, depending on reinforcement contingencies. However, analysis of residuals confirmed that systematic deviations of GLC predictions from the obtained data were present in both conditions, suggesting that an alternative account of responding in multidimensional category learning tasks may be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 326
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pigeons' Tracking of Relevant Attributes in Categorization Learning
    Castro, Leyre
    Wasserman, Edward A.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (02): : 195 - 211
  • [32] Velocity-Based Motion Categorization by Pigeons
    Cook, Robert G.
    Beale, Kevin
    Koban, Angie
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 2011, 37 (02): : 175 - 188
  • [33] The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis
    Guentuerkuen, Onur
    Koenen, Charlotte
    Iovine, Fabrizio
    Garland, Alexis
    Pusch, Roland
    LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 46 (03) : 229 - 241
  • [34] Categorization of stimuli and sequential effects
    Petzold, P
    Haubensak, G
    FECHNER DAY 99: THE END OF 20TH CENTURY PSYCHOPHYSICS, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 326 - 331
  • [35] Perceptual differentiation during categorization learning by pigeons
    Aitken, MRF
    Bennett, CH
    McLaren, IPL
    Mackintosh, NJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1996, 22 (01): : 43 - 50
  • [36] A Comparative Analysis of the Categorization of Multidimensional Stimuli: I. Unidimensional Classification Does Not Necessarily Imply Analytic Processing; Evidence From Pigeons (Columba livia), Squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis), and Humans (Homo sapiens)
    Wills, A. J.
    Lea, Stephen E. G.
    Leaver, Lisa A.
    Osthaus, Britta
    Ryan, Catriona M. E.
    Suret, Mark B.
    Bryant, Catherine M. L.
    Chapman, Sue J. A.
    Millar, Louise
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 123 (04) : 391 - 405
  • [37] Tracking of unpredictable moving stimuli by pigeons
    Anna Wilkinson
    Kimberly Kirkpatrick
    Learning & Behavior, 2020, 48 : 27 - 40
  • [38] INTEROCULAR GENERALIZATION ON COLOR STIMULI IN PIGEONS
    OGAWA, T
    ANNUAL OF ANIMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 16 (02): : 87 - &
  • [39] PROCESSING MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULI
    MARKS, LE
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 442 - 442
  • [40] STAGEWISE MULTIDIMENSIONAL VISUAL DISCRIMINATION BY PIGEONS
    Vyazovska, Olga V.
    Navarro, Victor M.
    Wasserman, Edward A.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2016, 106 (01) : 58 - 74