CATEGORIZATION OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULI BY PIGEONS

被引:13
|
作者
Berg, Mark E. [1 ]
Grace, Randolph C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Richard Stockton Coll New Jersey, Dept Psychol, Pomona, NJ 08240 USA
[2] Univ Canterbury, Dept Psychol, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
关键词
multidimensional categorization; Gabor patch; General Linear Classifier; optimality; pigeons; INTEGRATION; BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION; REINFORCERS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; ATTENTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.2010.94-305
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Six pigeons responded in a visual category learning task in which the stimuli were dimensionally separable Gabor patches that varied in frequency and orientation. We compared performance in two conditions which varied in terms of whether accurate performance required that responding be controlled jointly by frequency and orientation, or selectively by frequency. Results showed that pigeons learned both category tasks, with average overall accuracies of 85.5% and 82% in the joint and selective control conditions, respectively. Although perfect performance was possible, responding for all pigeons fell short of optimality. Model comparison analyses showed that the General Linear Classifier (GLC; Ashby, 1992) provided a better account of responding in the joint control condition than unidimensional models, but a unidimensional model fitted better for the condition that required selective control by frequency. Our results show that pigeons' responding in a visual categorization task can be controlled jointly or selectively by stimulus dimensions, depending on reinforcement contingencies. However, analysis of residuals confirmed that systematic deviations of GLC predictions from the obtained data were present in both conditions, suggesting that an alternative account of responding in multidimensional category learning tasks may be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 326
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ultra-rapid categorization in pigeons
    Kramer, K.
    Aust, U.
    Steurer, M.
    Huber, L.
    PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 : 174 - 174
  • [22] CONCEPTUAL BEHAVIOR IN PIGEONS - CATEGORIZATION OF BOTH FAMILIAR AND NOVEL EXAMPLES FROM 4 CLASSES OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL STIMULI
    BHATT, RS
    WASSERMAN, EA
    REYNOLDS, WF
    KNAUSS, KS
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1988, 14 (03): : 219 - 234
  • [23] Multidimensional visual discrimination by pigeons
    Vyazovska, O.
    Teng, Y.
    Pavlenko, D.
    Wasserman, E.
    PERCEPTION, 2013, 42 : 16 - 16
  • [24] The neuroscience of perceptual categorization in pigeons: A mechanistic hypothesis
    Onur Güntürkün
    Charlotte Koenen
    Fabrizio Iovine
    Alexis Garland
    Roland Pusch
    Learning & Behavior, 2018, 46 : 229 - 241
  • [25] Effects of stimulus manipulations on visual categorization in pigeons
    Lazareva, Olga F.
    Freiburger, Kate L.
    Wasserman, Edward A.
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2006, 72 (03) : 224 - 233
  • [26] PROTOTYPE IDENTIFICATION AND CATEGORIZATION OF INCOMPLETE FIGURES BY PIGEONS
    WHITE, KG
    ALSOP, B
    WILLIAMS, L
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1993, 30 (03) : 253 - 258
  • [27] Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons
    Astley, SL
    Wasserman, EA
    ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 26 (02): : 125 - 138
  • [28] TASTE STIMULI - A BEHAVIORAL CATEGORIZATION
    TAPPER, DN
    HALPERN, BP
    SCIENCE, 1968, 161 (3842) : 708 - &
  • [29] Incidental Categorization of Vibrotactile Stimuli
    Martinez, Juan S.
    Holt, Lori L.
    Reed, Charlotte M.
    Tan, Hong Z.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2020, 13 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [30] Novelty and functional equivalence in superordinate categorization by pigeons
    Suzette L. Astley
    Edward A. Wasserman
    Animal Learning & Behavior, 1998, 26 : 125 - 138