Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D

被引:1
|
作者
Bales, Scott R. [1 ]
Sprague, Christy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, 1066 Bogue St, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
2; 4-D choline; dicamba; dry bean; Phaseolus vulgaris L; Black bean; navy bean; off-target movement; spray tank contamination; HORSEWEED CONYZA-CANADENSIS; WEED MANAGEMENT; SPRAY DRIFT; GLYPHOSATE; RESISTANCE; HERBICIDES; INJURY; RESIDUES; SOYBEANS; RATES;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.127
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Dicamba and 2,4-D exposure to sensitive crops, such as dry bean, is of great concern with the recent registrations of dicamba- and 2,4-D-resistant soybean. In 2017 and 2018, field experiments were conducted at two Michigan locations to understand how multiple factors, including dry bean market class, herbicide rate, and application timing, influence dry bean response to dicamba and 2,4-D. Dicamba and 2,4-D at rates of 0.1%, 1%, and 10% of the field use rate for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were applied to V2 and V8 black and navy bean. Field-use rates for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were 560 and 1,120 g ae ha(-1), respectively. There were few differences between market classes or application timings when dry bean was exposed to dicamba or 2,4-D. Estimated rates to cause 20% dry bean injury 14 d after treatment were 4.5 and 107.5 g ae ha(-1) for dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively. When dicamba was applied at 56 g ae ha(-1), light interception was reduced up to 51% and maturity was delayed up to 16 d. Although both herbicides caused high levels of injury to dry bean, yield reductions were not consistently observed. At four site-years, 2,4-D did not reduce dry bean yield or seed weight with any rate tested. However, when averaged over site-years, dicamba rates of 3.7, 9.8 and 17.9 g ae ha(-1) were estimated to cause 5%, 10%, and 15% yield loss, respectively. Dicamba also reduced seed weight by 10% when 56 g ae ha(-1) was applied. However, the germination of harvested seed was not affected by dicamba or 2,4-D. Long delays in dry bean maturity from dicamba injury can also indirectly increase losses in yield and quality due to harvestability issues. This work further stresses the need for caution when using dicamba or 2,4-D herbicides near sensitive crops.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 124
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Effect of Cations and Ammonium Sulfate on the Efficacy of Dicamba and 2,4-D
    Roskamp, Jared M.
    Chahal, Gurinderbir S.
    Johnson, William G.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [42] Response of kochia (Kochia scoparia) inbreds to 2,4-D and dicamba
    Nandula, VK
    Manthey, FA
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (01) : 50 - 54
  • [43] TO 2,4-D OR NOT TO 2,4-D
    SHARP, S
    SALLEH, A
    SEARCH, 1993, 24 (03): : 60 - 62
  • [44] EFFECT OF 2,4-D ON BEAN PROGENY SEEDLINGS
    PRIDHAM, AMS
    SCIENCE, 1947, 105 (2729) : 412 - 412
  • [45] EVALUATION OF SEEDLING PROGENY OF SOYBEANS TREATED WITH 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, AND DICAMBA
    THOMPSON, L
    EGLI, DB
    WEED SCIENCE, 1973, 21 (02) : 141 - 144
  • [46] Weed Response to 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and Dicamba Applied Alone or with Glufosinate
    Merchant, Rand
    Sosnoskie, Lynn
    Culpepper, A.
    Steckel, Lawrence
    York, Alan
    Braxton, L.
    Ford, Jill
    JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, 2013, 17 (03): : 212 - 218
  • [47] Relationships between microbial biomass and dissipation of 2,4-D and dicamba in soil
    Voos, G
    Groffman, PM
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1997, 24 (01) : 106 - 110
  • [48] CULTIVAR SENSITIVITY OF GRAPEVINES TO 2,4-D
    HELLMAN, EW
    FRUIT VARIETIES JOURNAL, 1987, 41 (03): : 111 - 114
  • [49] Cotton Injury and Yield as Affected by Simulated Drift of 2,4-D and Dicamba
    Marple, Molly E.
    Al-Khatib, Kassim
    Peterson, Dallas E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) : 609 - 614
  • [50] Treatment of 2,4-D, mecoprop, and dicamba using membrane bioreactor technology
    Avik J. Ghoshdastidar
    Anthony Z. Tong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 5188 - 5197