Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D

被引:1
|
作者
Bales, Scott R. [1 ]
Sprague, Christy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, 1066 Bogue St, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
2; 4-D choline; dicamba; dry bean; Phaseolus vulgaris L; Black bean; navy bean; off-target movement; spray tank contamination; HORSEWEED CONYZA-CANADENSIS; WEED MANAGEMENT; SPRAY DRIFT; GLYPHOSATE; RESISTANCE; HERBICIDES; INJURY; RESIDUES; SOYBEANS; RATES;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2019.127
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Dicamba and 2,4-D exposure to sensitive crops, such as dry bean, is of great concern with the recent registrations of dicamba- and 2,4-D-resistant soybean. In 2017 and 2018, field experiments were conducted at two Michigan locations to understand how multiple factors, including dry bean market class, herbicide rate, and application timing, influence dry bean response to dicamba and 2,4-D. Dicamba and 2,4-D at rates of 0.1%, 1%, and 10% of the field use rate for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were applied to V2 and V8 black and navy bean. Field-use rates for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were 560 and 1,120 g ae ha(-1), respectively. There were few differences between market classes or application timings when dry bean was exposed to dicamba or 2,4-D. Estimated rates to cause 20% dry bean injury 14 d after treatment were 4.5 and 107.5 g ae ha(-1) for dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively. When dicamba was applied at 56 g ae ha(-1), light interception was reduced up to 51% and maturity was delayed up to 16 d. Although both herbicides caused high levels of injury to dry bean, yield reductions were not consistently observed. At four site-years, 2,4-D did not reduce dry bean yield or seed weight with any rate tested. However, when averaged over site-years, dicamba rates of 3.7, 9.8 and 17.9 g ae ha(-1) were estimated to cause 5%, 10%, and 15% yield loss, respectively. Dicamba also reduced seed weight by 10% when 56 g ae ha(-1) was applied. However, the germination of harvested seed was not affected by dicamba or 2,4-D. Long delays in dry bean maturity from dicamba injury can also indirectly increase losses in yield and quality due to harvestability issues. This work further stresses the need for caution when using dicamba or 2,4-D herbicides near sensitive crops.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 124
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Extractability of 2,4-D, dicamba and MCPP from soil
    Virginia State University, P.O. Box 9005, Petersburg, VA 23806, United States
    不详
    Water Air Soil Pollut., 1-2 (155-170):
  • [22] The influence of 2,4-D and dicamba on the physiology of olive seedlings
    Rubert, Jaine
    Somavilla, Iuri
    Leichtweiss, Eduard
    Avila Neto, Roberto
    Thomasi, Rosana
    Tarouco, Camila
    Berghetti, Alvaro
    Nicoloso, Fernando
    Ulguim, Andre
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 59
  • [23] MOBILITY OF DICAMBA, PICLORAM AND 2,4-D IN SOIL COLUMNS
    GROVER, R
    WEED SCIENCE, 1977, 25 (02) : 159 - 162
  • [24] Determination of 2,4-D and Dicamba in food crops by MEKC
    Lanças, FM
    Rissato, SR
    Galhiane, MS
    CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1999, 50 (1-2) : 35 - 40
  • [25] Cotton response to preplant applications of 2,4-D or dicamba
    Price, Katilyn
    Li, Xiao
    Leon, Ramon G.
    Price, Andrew
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 96 - 100
  • [26] FORAGE LEGUME RESPONSE TO DICAMBA AND 2,4-D APPLICATIONS
    GRIFFIN, JL
    WATSON, VH
    KNIGHT, WE
    COLE, AW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1984, 76 (03) : 487 - 490
  • [27] LEACHING OF 2,4-D AND DICAMBA FROM HOME LAWNS
    GOLD, AJ
    MORTON, TG
    SULLIVAN, WM
    MCCLORY, J
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1988, 37 (1-2): : 121 - 129
  • [28] Extractability of 2,4-D, Dicamba and MCPP from Soil
    Asmare Atalay
    Keon-Joong Hwang
    Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1999, 114 : 155 - 170
  • [29] EFFECT OF DRIFT CONCENTRATIONS OF 2,4-D AND DICAMBA ON PEPPER
    GILREATH, JP
    HORTSCIENCE, 1987, 22 (05) : 1120 - 1120
  • [30] Defining Glyphosate and Dicamba Drift Injury to Dry Edible Pea, Dry Edible Bean, and Potato
    Hatterman-Valenti, Harlene
    Endres, Greg
    Jenks, Brian
    Ostlie, Michael
    Reinhardt, Theresa
    Robinson, Andrew
    Stenger, John
    Zollinger, Richard
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 502 - 509